User talk:2600:4040:403F:BF00:1034:A6D2:44E7:F4F6

July 2023

Hello, I'm Etriusus. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Sanctioned Suicide that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 03:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sanctioned Suicide. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Clyde H. Mapping (talk) 03:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

There is no RS for 'controversial', the articles titles all disparage the site and are specifically about the dangers and harm caused (even in the article title themselves), there is no way to establish neutral point of view when all the sources are negative. 2600:4040:403F:BF00:1034:A6D2:44E7:F4F6 (talk) 03:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Please direct me to which source says there is controversy about the site, which also names the site, and isn't specifically about highlighting the site as an extreme danger to children and other vulnerable populations that visit it? 2600:4040:403F:BF00:1034:A6D2:44E7:F4F6 (talk) 03:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sanctioned Suicide. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. :3 F4U (they/it) 03:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---