Jump to content

User talk:2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:C1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:C1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

In the article for the 2018 Senate election in California, there was a sentence on the article that was violent hate speech against the elderly. It was completely unacceptable, so I removed it. Then people reverted my edit. I am still confused to why these people did so. At the time I got furious and said some stuff I shouldnt have. All I wanted to do was to defend the elderly from violence, which is a personal issue for me since my grandmother was killed in a violent attack. I should of handled myself better and assumed good faith, which was very hard to do at the time. I am honestly baffled that people wanted the violence to stay, and I would like to hear a reason why. In an attempt to make up for what happened eariler and resolve the issue, I reached out all the users involved and kindly asked them to explain their positions on the issue. For this I was blocked again. I promise that I am done with assuming bad faith on fellow editors and now am ready to have a good discussion. Could you please unblock me so I can do so and we can resolve this issue? Could you also please explain why people want the violence to stay? Thank you for understanding. 2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:C1 (talk) 02:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's not enough information here to tell if those actions are in any way related to the block. In any case, you are free to edit so long as you sign in with your account and so long as that account is not blocked. If you do not have an account, one can be created for you via WP:ACC. Yamla (talk) 10:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Krist Novoselic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hohokam Stadium, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.