User talk:2600:1700:20:1D80:68E0:803D:494B:216D

November 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1700:20:1D80:68E0:803D:494B:216D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just found out I was blocked because I used the exact same reference that somebody else used?! I copied it verbatim from the Spanish wikipedia, is that not allowed? It is a legitimate source, so there should be no limits on how many times it can be used on different pages.

Decline reason:

You must return to your account to request unblock. 331dot (talk) 20:40, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1700:20:1D80:68E0:803D:494B:216D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What do you mean by return? This is the account that I edited from and was blocked from editing.2600:1700:20:1D80:68E0:803D:494B:216D (talk) 21:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an account. Yamla (talk) 23:37, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ymblanter: why are you doing this? You also blocked some other editor who supported my proposal? Is this how you deal with discussion? I was only doing what was recommended by @Anarchyte:, I created request for comment and should not be punished like this.--2600:1700:20:1D80:68E0:803D:494B:216D (talk) 21:18, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't an account, this is an IP address. IP addresses are not accounts. The claim in the block log is that you are evading a block on an account. 331dot (talk) 22:42, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: but I am not. I also have no idea who this other editor is, who seems to have been similarly accused. We have no relationship whatsoever.--2600:1700:20:1D80:68E0:803D:494B:216D (talk) 23:11, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1700:20:1D80:68E0:803D:494B:216D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked apparently because I used the same exact reference that somebody else had used before me. I copied the reference from the Spanish wikipedia, there was no intention of impersonating someone. I am told that I should "return" to my account because I am evading it but that is just not true. They also blocked this other editor for the same reason, like we are somehow related, but we have no relationship at all! This is a mistake. I am not this other IP editor or anyone else. 2600:1700:20:1D80:68E0:803D:494B:216D (talk) 03:34, 28 November 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

But how would we know that? Especially on an IP range. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:42, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.