User talk:2600:1017:B42C:4945:E5C4:EDC4:4041:1433

December 2015

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Neo-Nazism, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 08:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Donald Trump with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 08:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but suggesting that Trump is a fascist is not vandalism. I can name a dozen candidates for president who called Trump a fascist in the last week. Be reasonable. That article is incredibly slanted pro-trump. 2600:1017:B42C:4945:E5C4:EDC4:4041:1433 (talk) 08:47, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. As I said on my talk page, speaker's corner is over here. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Even if I agree with everything you say, Wikipedia needs reliable sources. If you continue the way you have edited up to now, you will be blocked, and you will accomplish nothing here. If you try to follow the rules, you have a chance of making a possibly lasting contributing. Good luck! - DVdm (talk) 08:52, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cute but I'm not "soap boxing." I have at least 100 references of Trump being called a fascist, if you want to add the text, including from every republican candidate aside from Carson and Cruz. This is not my opinion. The article as it stands now, is quite ridiculous and is an embarrassment to the encylopedia. 2600:1017:B42C:4945:E5C4:EDC4:4041:1433 (talk) 08:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, relevant references, that is exactly what you need. Without them, you will add nothing of this sort to Wikipedia. So you better list those references on the article talk page and wait for response from the other editors. You could also add a properly sourced piece of text directly to the article, but make sure the tone is neutral (wp:NPOV) and the references are relevant (wp:V). - DVdm (talk) 09:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a suggestion on your talk page. I have many, many more references but was told not to "cite kill" last time so I've limited it to four. I do have at least 100, though. 2600:1017:B42C:4945:E5C4:EDC4:4041:1433 (talk) 09:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to post anything on my talk page. The place to be is the article talk page, where articles are discussed. User talk pages are more suitable for discussions about user behaviour. Good luck at Talk:Donald Trump. - DVdm (talk) 09:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.