User talk:2600:1012:A021:D999:9CAF:FB34:62C4:2D78

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, at 2600:1012:A021:D999:9CAF:FB34:62C4:2D78, has made edits to User talk:38.126.71.24 that do not conform to our policies and guidelines and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 16:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fake warnings should be removed. 2600:1012:A021:D999:9CAF:FB34:62C4:2D78 (talk) 17:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. You removed a warning for this edit. Drmies (talk) 17:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the context. These fake warnings were posted at a bunch of different editors by a single-day IP editor acting as a fake mod. See here for what I mean. 2600:1012:A021:D999:9CAF:FB34:62C4:2D78 (talk) 17:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And yet, you removed a warning that was given for this edit. What is the point of removing warnings, mostly on IP talk page and in a couple of cases in archives, from two years ago? Exactly--there is no point. If you want to comment, you can write up a note with some diffs and copy and paste that on pages where editors were not vandalizing, but what you are doing right now is disruptive, useless, and a waste of time. Drmies (talk) 17:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reread the responses to here for context. All warnings by this IP user are fake. (A legitimate warning would not jump immediately to "may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia" for an innocuous or good-faith edit.)

And why did you revert the edits I made to Baltic Sea? That had nothing to do with what came after the Baltic Sea edits, which is when I discovered this user's fake warnings and wanted to clean them up so as to not leave misleading warnings. You coming to revert me is what's waste of time. 2600:1012:A021:D999:9CAF:FB34:62C4:2D78 (talk) 17:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, part of the mass rollback. But no, not all warnings were fake: I pointed to two already that were valid. Drmies (talk) 17:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.