User talk:2600:1010:B1A7:5CE1:F888:A176:26F6:1B94

February 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces (Wikipedia) for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 17:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1010:B1A7:5CE1:F888:A176:26F6:1B94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, you just blocked me for claiming to be disruptive and asking nonsensical questions. When in fact, I did not. I was asking really good questions on Teahouse and help desk. I also go more in depth. There is even no way to partially block me for good reason. And I’m being curious about how Wikipedia works. I’m also asking why talk pages aren’t forums. This reason of block is invalid and unjustified. So can you review my block in certain areas please? —- 2600:1010:B1A7:5CE1:F888:A176:26F6:1B94 (talk) 18:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No chance. Yamla (talk) 20:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2600:1010:B1A7:5CE1:F888:A176:26F6:1B94 (talk) 18:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're blatantly not a new editor since you knew about Dream Island and how to find a closed MFD, and the block was lenient, but I won't stand in the way of someone else's decision about whether to unblock. You're welcome to edit productively in all other areas, but there's no reason to edit in project space. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Star Mississippi (talk • contribs)

@UtherSRG: you blocked Special:Contributions/2601:205:C001:EA0:40CA:58DC:F0A2:2871 for the same edit @PaulRKil: flagged. I am about to log off, but if you think this block needs upgrading or if a range block would help. Star Mississippi 19:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@UtherSRG and @Star Mississippi this user is a sock puppet of User talk:204.129.232.191 who was given a three year ban for similar low quality edits. This user is a repeat vandal and has been warned repeatedly to stop. PaulRKil (talk) 19:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that's helpful @PaulRKil and User_talk:204.129.232.191#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Battle_for_BFB_(January_17) certainly answers (some of) the Teahouse disruption. Definitely needs a longer block and not unblocking. @Daniel Case @Bbb23 FYI Star Mississippi 19:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi: I've blocked the /64 range sitewide for one week without TPA for the block evasion. I didn't see any basis for blocking longer than that as they haven't been using this range except for today. If they return, we can block longer. Also, I can tell you from past experience that you do not want to listen to this person, which is why I revoked TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm apparently wearing my loon magnet today, so don't need to tell me twice. Star Mississippi 23:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

…………………… —2600:1010:B1A7:5CE1:F888:A176:26F6:1B94 (talk) 19:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're trying to accomplish here. PaulRKil (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It means that I was busted since an admin caught me doing those edit and my block will be longer than usual. —2600:1010:B1A7:5CE1:F888:A176:26F6:1B94 (talk) 19:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User-generated content, you may be blocked from editing.

PaulRKil (talk) 19:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Bbb23 (talk) 20:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.