Jump to content

User talk:2600:1005:B120:B2A6:1FF:1786:8891:C807

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Talk:White Americans—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 22:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Why was I blocked?

[edit]

Why was I blocked? -2600:1005:B120:B2A6:1FF:1786:8891:C807 (talk) 23:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There have been no edits made on this range that adhere to WP:NPOV and WP:V.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:22, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to apologize. -2600:1005:B120:B2A6:1FF:1786:8891:C807 (talk) 23:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1005:B120:B2A6:1FF:1786:8891:C807 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand now that my views were hurtful and didn’t align to facts. If unblocked, I will make an official Wikipedia account, and will focus my editing efforts on American history. Thank you. —2600:1005:B120:B2A6:1FF:1786:8891:C807 (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No thanks, see WP:NONAZIS. You'll be happier somewhere else, Wikipedia isn't the place for this crap. Yamla (talk) 23:36, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is there any way I can earn another chance? -2600:1005:B120:B2A6:1FF:1786:8891:C807 (talk) 23:49, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not any time soon. Wikipedia has a dim view of the crap you are spewing. --Yamla (talk) 23:52, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What’s so wrong with being a conservative? -2600:1005:B120:B2A6:1FF:1786:8891:C807 (talk) 00:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing wrong with being a conservative. You weren't blocked for that. Wikipedia has many actively contributing conservative editors. Vandalising the encyclopaedia, though, like you did at two Irish-related articles, and whatever it is you were trying to do at Talk:White Americans? Yeah, that'll get you blocked. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 13:30, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you. I didn’t know what I was doing. I hope I can be given a second chance. Thanks. -2600:1005:B120:B2A6:1FF:1786:8891:C807 (talk) 14:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022 (2)

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1005:B120:B2A6:1FF:1786:8891:C807 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that what I did was hurtful and very unnecessary. I should have not vandalized the two Irish pages, as well as the White Americans page. If I am given another chance to contribute here, I will start making meaningful contributions in the field of American history. Thank you in advance. —2600:1005:B120:B2A6:1FF:1786:8891:C807 (talk) 14:44, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note there's a specific user with a blocked account, operating from this IP address range. This unblock request should be declined out of hand; the user is most definitely not operating in good faith and is simply trolling at this point. To the user trolling us, knock it off. Request an unblock with your original account. Stop evading your block. --Yamla (talk) 15:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2600:1005:B120:B2A6:1FF:1786:8891:C807&oldid=1076140519"