User talk:2600:1003:B45C:B29C:ADA9:387D:4A4E:806B

February 2019

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that repeatedly triggered the edit filter.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Swarm~ {talk} 20:52, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1003:B45C:B29C:ADA9:387D:4A4E:806B (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here I was NOT trying to vandalize like I said. I seriously think this is a personal attack because someone else vandalized and possibly socked on the IP range and deliberately punishing anyone who uses this IP for their errors.

Decline reason:

See below. Boiler plate follows-- I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Hey Swarm -- this seems to be no fault of the user. I don't know how the filter works, but the page being linked to that the filter is bugging about is a perfectly legit article in the Harvard Crimson about Liza M; it happens to have a link to another Crimson article entitled "Shit Robot Best Heard Drunk and in the Dark", which I suspect is the problem. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 21:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

• Examining the filter, it seems to be specifically designed for an IP-hopping vandal within this range, who's known for, apart from obvious vandalism, "contralto disruption". I may be misreading something here, but it doesn't appear to be a false positive, although it appears to be one at face value (something noted in the filter itself). Pinging Galobtter for further input. ~Swarm~ {talk} 21:34, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Contralto. Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

@Jpgordon, Swarm, and Dlohcierekim: Swarm, thanks for the ping; yup, it is definitely them - they ( Special:Contributions/Ineversigninsodonotmessageme) are obsessed with changing the vocal ranges of various singers and have posted misleading FP reports and unblock requests before. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

@Jpgordon, Swarm, and Galobtter: Well, the source does seem to support the content.16:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop

Please stop harassing this IP range. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1003:B45D:A722:2CC0:2D8:D1C2:FB2E (talk) 01:58, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

---