User talk:25Aric

Welcome!

Hi 25Aric! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! TheBigBookOfNaturalScience 📖 (💬/📜) 17:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 17:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MarchOfTheGreyhounds I'm sorry if i offended you. My sincere apologies 25Aric (talk) 12:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't offend me in the slightest, the legal threats stuff is just Wikipedia policy.

I think it would be a shame if you left, as you have made some productive contributions. It can be hard getting used to editing on Wikipedia.

I reccomend in your next unblock request, you should withdraw any possible threat of legal action and you should be fine. I think your English is good enough to contribute here. Good luck and feel free to ask if you need any help! MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 12:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, thanks for the advice too 25Aric (talk) 13:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I still feel that Chronus tried to offend me but I guess I won't do anything because he is arrogant(according to me) and probably is better than me in using this platform. He criticizes my apology too which is probably why most people get offended with him. I am usually pretty down to earth, but such users might be annoying. I hope you understand. 25Aric (talk) 13:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand these disputes can be frustrating. The best thing to do for the time being is to just let it go. Hopefully, you can get back to making productive contributions soon! MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 13:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's just experiences. I just want to come back for a moment because I sensed a correction on a page I am not satified with. The reference gives a different info so I need to reasearch and edit it, and the research speaks contrary 25Aric (talk) 13:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect! Take it easy and good luck, I'm rooting for you. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 13:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 25Aric (talk) 14:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MarchOfTheGreyhounds I have still not been unblocked. It shows an administrator has done a revision but it doesn't show any difference. 25Aric (talk) 15:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @25Aric just stay patient. Hopefully an administrator will be able to look at the request soon (sometimes it can take a little while though).

I'm not an expert but I think the unblock request looks good, since you clearly retracted the legal threat. Hold tight and hopefully you can be editing again soon! MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 15:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the motivation 25Aric (talk) 15:32, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MarchOfTheGreyhoundsAn admin has edited my page and I don't understand the thing he has done as I am stil blocked 25Aric (talk) 16:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you placed your second unblock request in the wrong place on your talk page (above the first unblock request) so an admin just moved it to the correct place but did not carry out a full review yet.

Try to stay patient and don't worry! Sometimes an admin comes along right away to review a block, sometimes it takes a little while.

Relax and wait for a notification saying your request has been reviewed. In the meantime, take a breath and do something relaxing for a little while. Have a cup of tea and do a little reading perhaps. :) MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 17:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Thanks 25Aric (talk) 17:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MarchOfTheGreyhounds They refused it again. I have lost all hope but thanks for the motivations you had given 25Aric (talk) 01:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are just blatantly calling me a criminal. I hate this now... 25Aric (talk) 01:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are some admins so rude? They literally son't accept requests.. 25Aric (talk) 01:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We are not mandated to accept your requests to your satisfaction, and your continued behavior is proving that you're not a fit for a collaborative project. You're welcome to edit on other projects, but if you demonstrate the same behavior you'll find yourself blocked there as well. So if you do opt to edit elsewhere, you'll have to make some changes. Star Mississippi 01:44, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But I know my mistakes and want to improve so why not giving me a chance? 25Aric (talk) 10:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How will I edit if you don't unblock me. How am I even goping to be satisfied? 25Aric (talk) 10:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me my faults, I haven't made any threats or things which hurt others after being blocked. I feel you are trying to take out another reason to keep me blocked and that's not fair. I want to come back. 25Aric (talk) 11:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to file another unblock request and make a compelling case. Star Mississippi 13:42, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will always remember you for this chance 25Aric (talk) 16:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi I have filed another unblock request 👍. Thanks once again for the chance! 25Aric (talk) 01:48, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great. You'll see I've moved it to the bottom of the page where patrolling admins will expect to find it. Good luck! Star Mississippi 02:20, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 25Aric (talk) 03:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi The block has still not been reviewed. I guess the administrators have to review a lot of them today... 25Aric (talk) 14:54, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

plus it's peak summer holidays Star Mississippi 01:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a day 25Aric (talk) 01:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my country, rains have started and the weather in my city is so good that everyone absolutely loves it. I'll be patient for another day 25Aric (talk) 02:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi How long will it take 25Aric (talk) 13:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Until an admin is convinced you can edit collaboratively. Star Mississippi 12:37, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok 25Aric (talk) 15:36, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star MississippiThanks to be friendly enough to give me another chance(even though you blocked me). I thought you would be strict and would decline me without any reason but it came out to be otherwise. You probably are the reason I read so many guidelines in wikipedia which I probably wouldn't have. You understand your duty and in my perception, you are doing quite well. Hope God brings happiness to your life.

Thank you 25Aric (talk) 05:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi My unblock request has been declined. I want a chance, if rules are violated further after an unblock, I promise, I won't question a block. 25Aric (talk) 02:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. You blew all of your last chances with me when you said @Z1720 The reason why people become evil and do stuff that harm articles is because of rejections from people like you. while trying to get unblocked and while @Z1720 was willing to help you. You're of course welcome to file a new unblock, but you'd need to be significantly more compelling. If you continue to badger, you will lose talk page access. Star Mississippi 23:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

well whatever, I don't want to make anymore attempts as I feel, no matter what I will stay blocked 25Aric (talk) 01:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But it was his mistake too since he didnot read the complete message I had given! 25Aric (talk) 01:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTTHEM Star Mississippi 01:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think I will never be unblocked, leave it! 25Aric (talk) 12:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

People hate everywhere...either because of jealousy or without any reason...It's better to be dead than be hated...probably life of mine is meaningless...bye!!! 25Aric (talk) 12:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

out of suicidal thoughts for now, ignore the above message 25Aric (talk) 13:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star MississippiThanks 25Aric (talk) 01:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi It's been a week...could you please confirm whether my request has been declined or not 25Aric (talk) 08:39, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will be notified when someone acts on your request whether that is to accept or decline it. Star Mississippi 18:24, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oh I see 25Aric (talk) 02:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am reviewing your unblock request below, but I am still waiting for your responses to my questions. It will take more than a day for your unblock request to be reviewed. If you want the process to go quicker, please follow the thread under your latest unblock request and answer questions concisely. Z1720 (talk) 15:41, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually a bit busy at the moment..but I apologize for wasting your valuable time. 25Aric (talk) 01:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have written everything I could in the small amount of time I got, I might be busy for a while 25Aric (talk) 05:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrary break

Hi 25Aric. I'm sorry to see you leave over that discussion, because it is apparent from the history of the page that you were not responsible for overfilling the intro section of List of tallest buildings in India with images; it was already like that when you started editing the page. Editors were wrong to blame you for that. However, neither admins nor the IP editor were unfair to you in drawing your attention to policy; editors do not have the right to order others not to change a page, and I have removed your hidden notes forbidding changes to two of the images currently at the top of the article. See WP:OWN; Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Please consider returning to edit on this or other topics; Wikipedia needs enthusiastic and knowledgeable editors. But please return as one among equals, as we all are here. And if you do, please note that threats to report fellow editors to legal authorities are forbidden. I appreciate your apology at User talk:Chronus; that shows introspection and collegiality. But nobody was impugning your character, and if you return, you need to know that any such threats, no matter how vague, will result in your being blocked, because they create a chilling effect on the editing community here. Yngvadottir (talk) 23:57, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I told that only if I perceived continued attack on my character and I know ,I am not going to face any attack on my character further on, but this is not something to ban me from viewing wikipedian pages. As an editor I have made many contributions to pages and this seems like disrespect. That comment was to prevent people from deleting every skyline images. I even told in the talk that if there is any change in skyline the image could be reverted. I did give freedom to edit the skyline but probably I should have mentioned that in the comment. I have made a discussion on Lokhandwala Minerva's conflicting heights so I have tried to be collabrative at my best. 25Aric (talk) 11:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You still don't seem to understand: you have no authority to give Wikipedia editors orders. No one needs your permission to change your edits. No one needs your permission to edit or delete skyline articles or images. As a precondition of editing Wikipedia, you agreed that any edit you made could be edited, altered, removed or deleted at will and without warning. That you still don't seem to get it is a factor as to why multiple admins don't feel that you're a good fit for Wikipedia. Ravenswing 12:54, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RavenswingI had written this before. After reading the guidelines I have understood my mistake. I will allow others to change my edit but now since I am blocked, I can't do it. 25Aric (talk) 13:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had even given the freedom to change the image, I think you havn't read whatever i told probably because I am blocked. I want to be an editor but I think faults happen but chances were not given to me 25Aric (talk) 13:27, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yngvadottir I'm sorry if my words offeneded you 25Aric (talk) 12:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 00:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why have I been blocked from using wikipedia? I need an explaination. What kind of legal threats are you referring to? 25Aric (talk) 11:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...and so I might move to court if they continue this. --MuZemike 11:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's only if there is serious attack on my character but I myself said I don't want to continue and so I don't undertand why it should be taken seriously? 25Aric (talk) 11:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok if that was offending, I assure you that I won't do that again. I apologize. I don't like to argue with others anyway 25Aric (talk) 11:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

25Aric (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand my mistakes. Probably, not having a good english makes me sound kind of arrogant as I don't have idea of many words. I didn't mean to take legal action as it was only the case if my character was insulted to level of intolerance and I think that's understandable. I was not going to take any legal action for their false accusations against me(You could refer to my talk page to know more as one administrator already apologized) and perhaps the admins misinterpreted my sentences. If i really meant that, I would have directly contacted the admins I promise I will make sure I use a translator before I write so that my words don't sound offensive. I have made contributions to wikipedia which were helpful and have tried to be as collabrative by discussing about the edits. 25Aric (talk) 12:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you need to use a translator to contribute to this Wikipedia effectively, you lack the requisite skill with English to do so, and you may find it easier to contribute to the version of Wikipedia that is in a language with which you are more familiar. There is nothing special about the English Wikipedia, it is not the "premier" Wikipedia.

Regarding your request, you leave open the possibility of legal action "only if there is a serious attack on my character". You must unequivocally withdraw any and all threats of legal action to be unblocked. Note that we cannot prevent you from taking legal action according to the laws of your country if you so choose, but you cannot make legal threats on Wikipedia. You can pursue grievances with Wikipedia using Wikipedia processes or the courts of your country, but not both at the same time. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 12:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

25Aric (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am apologetic for my behavior. I have read all guidelines and ensure none of them will be violated in the future. I don't intend to make threats and will continue to be coperative and collabratice. I will discuss productively with other editors and make sure to improve every wikipedia page with need. I promise to never take legal action against anyone in this community 25Aric (talk) 13:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think you're a good fit for a collaborative website if you're willing to threaten people who disagree with your edits. This kind of bullying happens too often on the internet, and I'm tired of people just letting it go. If there are no repercussions when people threaten legal action, they'll just keep doing it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

25Aric (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I have made a mistake by being kind of authoritative and making legal threats. I have read all guidelines amnd have now got to know my mistakes. I will respect every other user on this platform and commit to abiding by all rules of the site. I want to be collabrative and helpful to this site in the future. ] :I have already helped the platform by making some necessary additions in architecture. If the administrators give me another chance, I ensure that none of the rules will be violated ever. I have worked hard with my english and brought myself to be eligible for the site. I will try to contribute my best to the site of Info. 25Aric (talk) 01:47, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"If the user isn't a persuasive person, I would quitely correct the mistakes done by him." No, this is how disruption happens on Wikipedia. If another editor disagrees with your edit, you cannot just add it back into the article and hope the other editor doesn't notice. Z1720 (talk) 16:23, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

25Aric, please describe better ways that editors can resolve disputes. WP:DR has some information about this. Please be as specific as possible. Z1720 (talk) 01:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720I have read that 25Aric (talk) 10:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the answer we need though. You need to go into detail as to how to better settle editing disputes. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not having any disputes. I don't want to get into one because I rarely make edits diagreeable but there was just on editor who I had with but our dispute is settled...I am just waiting for unblock. 25Aric (talk) 12:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can settle disputes by-

1. Bringing third or more experienced party and his will most probably works.

2. Making final decisions which suite both parties

3. Being as friendly and convincible as possible

4. Understanding the other user's intentions 25Aric (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not convinced by these answers that you understand how Wikipedia editors can resolve disputes. Please read WP:DR carefully again, and read about Wikipedia's policy on consensus at WP:CON. When you are ready, please describe how you would resolve disputes on Wikipedia, providing as much detail as possible and describing how you will do some of these procedures (eg: how will you bring in a third party, per point 1? How will you structure your arguments to be convincable, per point 3?) Z1720 (talk) 17:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok fine..give me time, I will do that tomorrow 25Aric (talk) 01:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. I can bring the third party by mentioning them or in case the user is breaking the guidelines, I will inform that to the administrators. The third party will usually be the person who is more familiar with the topic.

2. The final decisions will agree on the positive points of the two parties, though it doesn't work all the time(like in my case). It could be beneficial in preventing edit wars.

3. I will convince the other faction by presenting sources which prove myself or prove the opposition wrong. It will be of a reputed and reliable site.

4. It could be that I maybe wrong, I will try to be patient and have a self research in order to understand the motives the other editor.

5. If in case, the other editor is not willing to understand. I will simply disengage to prevent tonnes of Talk wars.

6. If the user isn't a persuasive person, I would quitely correct the mistakes done by him.

7. If I have tried my best and still the dispute is going on, I would request arbritration and provide my reasonable answers and ways IO tried to resolve the dispute.

8. The administrators will be also be informed if it turns out to be an edit war.

9. If it would be my fault, I would apologize to the other user

10. If the user continues harming important parts, I would request for comment in order to alert the editors from making harmful changes 25Aric (talk) 05:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720 I meant that if a person wasn't responding to me, I would do my job. It means that the person isn't interested.. The fact that you only pointed at that one line and forgot to read the others.

I think you are persuasive enough so please revaluate. This is what most users do to the other's edits and me, Who has even discussed for 'undoing' , is banned. I mean you could have atleast read the above lines, why would I quitely do that before discussion, only if the user has not responded to discuss. If he is interested, he would come to discuss. I want to come back to editing and please give me a chance. If I do this mistake again, I would never question it, so please sir/madam! 25Aric (talk) 02:20, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to open a new unblock request and another admin will evaluate your responses. Z1720 (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have lost hope now, You just rejected my request because you didnot read the response fully, and this is what others have been doing. Even the previous decline wasn't a valid reason. If I file more unblocks, I won't be able to do that further. I found the system unfair as the people who have been rude are unblocked and I am blocked for discussing about an edit. I for the first time saw the bad way of implementation of guidelines in my life. I could have gone to the court for this block buyt I didn't, and this solely proves that I didn't violate basically anything. 25Aric (talk) 03:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720 The reason why people become evil and do stuff that harm articles is because of rejections from people like you. If you had a little patientence to read, this wouldn't have happened. The fact that I can't question this decline this reason, means my rights are curbed and hence I solely blame it on you to leave wikipedia 25Aric (talk) 03:23, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Star Mississippi 14:06, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #78000

is closed. User needs to clearly and concisely and unconditionally withdraw the legal threat. I suggested editing a Wikipedia in a language user is better at and then come back 500 edits and 6 months from now. Also, the reolving disputes above is not adequate. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS any unblock request should be with the unblock template. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to restore TPA, feel free @Deepfriedokra. It didn't seem to be serving a purpose with the latest edits. Star Mississippi 15:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure should be fun. Restoring TPA. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks 25Aric (talk) 13:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DeepfriedokraI have told multiple times that I have withdrawn any action to be taken and ensure none would be taken in the future...also I have made 350 edits on another site(the irony is that, most of the edits are related to grammar), I will be back soon! 25Aric (talk) 13:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic. Please put all that and address any other concerns in an unblock request, concisely and clearly.

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

I will not be the one to decide whether or not to unblock you -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've said some hurtful things on this talk page that will need to be unsaid. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you need to indicate having adjusted your perceptions. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DeepfriedokraI was under depression...and you know it's human tendency to get angry when things are going bad...but atleast I didn't take any legal action(the thing I was banned for) 25Aric (talk) 16:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were banned for the threat. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok...but I have taken it back 25Aric (talk) 01:07, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023 unblock request

Hey, I have reached 500 edits on another editing site...so can I apply for unblock? 25Aric (talk) 13:29, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to, but you'll still need to satisfactorily address all of the issues raised above. Star Mississippi 14:46, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks for providing a chance 25Aric (talk) 00:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's some glitch so my unblock request couldn't fit into the block, so can you do me a favor by including it (since you're an admin) 25Aric (talk) 14:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

25Aric (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am filing this unblock request after being rejected 3 times. I have understood that I shouldn't have made any legal threat against a user in Wikipedia. Perhaps, I was unaware of the rules out here. I was a very good contributor to this wiki but one mistake ended it all. :I appologize for my mistake and assure that it won't be repeated again. I promise to be a good contributor and pledge that I won't argue with any user and will state satisfactory point to prove my edit. I apologize to all admins who I have argued with but I realize that it was my mistake. I just want to be given one last chance because I am a changed person now who will abide by all rules of this editing site. I was told to contribute at least 500 edits on another editing site, which I did and in fact, correctedthe grammatical errors(the very thing my first appeal was declined). I promise that I will be one the best editors and now that I am comfortable with English, I find myself eligible to be part of this site again. :I have understood how to prove my point without causing an issue with the other editor and clear myself with facts. I have tried toi improve architecture- relating pages in Wikipedia and I aspire to do that again. :It was my dream to be editing in Wikipedia since I was a child. I have been a good editor all this while. I have understood my mistakes and take back my legal threat, I promise I won't make that mistake again. I just want to be given one chance to prove myself as one of the best contributors this site might have. I appologize to @Star Mississippi and @Chronus for being rude towards them and assure that I will be respectful towards other users and abide by the rules of this site. :Thank you for making me realize my mistakes and improving my character. 25Aric (talk) 14:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your 6 months have not yet elapsed. Come back in the late February 2024 time frame. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.