User talk:2406:3003:2002:57:11DA:1CED:A437:57A2

October 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:97.101.193.162. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Notice of harassment from User:101.127.139.158. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

ANI result

This is 97.101.193.162 (talk · contribs · WHOIS).

I would like to report User:101.127.139.158 and his alternate IP 2406:3003:2002:57:11DA:1CED:A437:57A2. Since yesterday (Oct. 16th, 2021) this user has vandalized my talk page with nonsensical edits and has repeatedly threatened to "Block" me & has falsely claimed that I have been "Blocked". He has no such power but still claims to otherwise. Here is a list of his edits:

2406:3003:2002:57:11DA:1CED:A437:57A2 (talk · contribs · WHOIS): [1] [2] [3] [4]

101.127.139.158 (talk · contribs · WHOIS): [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]

97.101.193.162 (talk) 19:21, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for taking the time to create a report with diffs.

Context: This was at WP:AIV before. I've sent the reporter to ANI because it's not a one-sided simple issue. The reporter favoured the encyclopedia with contributions such as Special:Diff/1043861255, Special:Diff/1043860093 and Special:Diff/1043860418. Their block log is extensive. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:49, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, this is going to be difficult to deal with because of the lack of accounts on either side... What to do.. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Warnings all around? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

The IP addresses appear to be static enough for long-term blocks, though. I'd say the main question is whether either or both editor(s) are disruptive enough to justify that measure. And I'm afraid both are, but I didn't want to respond to harassment concerns by blocking the reporter without discussion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Warnings could do, both users use their talk pages. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

@ToBeFree: Let's just go with that.

• 97.101 shouldn't vandalize articles and be uncivil.
• 101.27 / 2406:3003 shouldn't pretend to be an admin and harass 97.101 about their block log. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

---