Jump to content

User talk:2401:D800:51E1:CC85:36E0:9AF0:A658:3BD0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Annam is the term used by the Vietnamese ancestors to counteract the Chinese dynasties from barbarians, with the meaning of continuing the traditional Tang dynasty. This good meaning was misunderstood by extremist ethnic people, after which they affected Americans who did not care about Vietnam. I have tried to explain many times that Daiviet is an unacceptable term nor does it be history, but they do not listen and just try to cancel my article. The concept of Daiviet consists of all modern China and Vietnam, so it is only in the communication of some royal officials, but most people still use Annam as a pride. I really hurt because my country's history has been written by racism and not knowing Vietnamese language.

Sorry, I didn't know that that was why you changed the term earlier; I thought that you were changing it to be a different group of people and changing the content of the article because I didn't know what that term meant earlier. I was not intending to be racist in any way. I noticed how you went to that article's Talk page; thank you for contacting the other editors involved with the article to discuss changing the term to Annam, but it could be more effective to convince other editors to change the wording by rewording your argument and elaborating. Swearing is not going to convince other editors and could be seen as offensive, so it's best to remove that word. Please also make sure to assume good faith. The reason why the article is referring to Vietnam instead of Annam is likely because people are unaware of the term Annam instead of them having any sort of racist motive, so it'd be better to explain the historical context of Annam instead of jumping to that conclusion. That Tired TarantulaBurrow 17:47, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm That Tired Tarantula. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Khmer–Cham wars, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. That Tired TarantulaBurrow 16:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.