User talk:24.78.138.224

Attention:

This IP address, 24.78.138.224, is registered to Shaw Communications. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

February 2023

Hello! I'm Millahnna. Your recent edit(s) to the page The Sixth Sense appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Millahnna (talk) 22:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:29, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I DID discuss it though! Plus, my reliable sources were removed by somebody who refuses to accept that the information that THEY are going by is nothing but biased lies and misinformation- and as a fact-checker, I called them out on that, so they didn't like it, had a hissy fit, and removed my reliable sources because they didn't like being called out. That's not on me- it's on THEM. As a fact-checker, I am the one with the legitimate information! 24.78.138.224 (talk) 04:36, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You would block a fact-checker? I HIGHLY doubt that, because if it wasn't for people like me, this world would be even worse off than it already is! The world NEEDS fact-checkers like me to help them know the difference being lies and reality! You should be thanking me for having the correct information instead of threatening to block somebody for having the FACTS. 24.78.138.224 (talk) 04:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at The Sixth Sense. You've now been warned multiple times about this, and as such, should not be making genre edits to this article without getting a consensus supporting your changes. DonIago (talk) 06:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus I have is from pretty much everyone on Planet Earth besides you, which also drastically outnumbers you ! Also, why did you put the spammer article back in? That's completely asinine on your part, as even multiple people on the spammer page's talk page confirmed that is is a spammer page, and that it shouldn't be used as a source! I'm the fact-checker here, which means I know what I'm talking about- UNLIKE you! What's so hard to understand about that? Hmm? Fact-checkers are always- and I mean ALWAYS- right, because we're the ones with the FACTS, and considering the FACTS are completely and utterly incapable of lying, that means that when going by the FACTS, that makes you ALWAYS right! You should try it sometime- it's really quite incredible being ALWAYS right! 24.78.138.224 (talk) 07:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But this IP address was never blocked to begin with! How can there have been any "block evasion" if this IP address was never blocked in the first place? This is BS and discrimination! 24.78.138.224 (talk) 04:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just because this is a University IP address does NOT mean it's block evasion, because Universities have multiple IP addresses. We also have no way of telling which- if any- or our students would've done anything to warrant an IP address block, but as we have a number of IP addresses for our students to use, even if they WERE to have used one of ours for negative purposes, using a different one in this case is NOT "block evasion", as they would have a different IP address in their dorms, as well as a different one if they're in the University itself. That's NOT "block evasion", that's BS! "Block evasion" would be intentional, whereas this is not! We're not talking immature high schoolers here, we're talking fully grown adults who are studying to become such highly-esteemed things as doctors, nurses, lawyers, therapists, etc- all of which are jobs that are FAR more esteemed than a Wikipedia editor! Even editing Wikipedia would classify as an extracurricular activity for our students, and as the dean of this highly esteemed university, by your wrongfully blocking our IP address without merit, explanation, or reason means that all the other sites our students use for their studies do the same, and we can't have that! In fact, blocking ANY of our IP addresses is strictly prohibited! That is a rule that our University stands by! 24.78.138.224 (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Bogus, BS "block".

You cannot tell us that this IP address was used for so-called "block evasion", when this is a University IP address, and is monitored constantly for the safety of our school and all its members- be they students or faculty members. Our students are required to have accounts for their studies, and as such, blocking this IP address is strictly prohibited! You have no proof of this IP address- or any of our other IP addresses- being used for "block evasion", and while we do have multiple IP addresses here, that is because the students have a specific one for their dorms as well as different ones within the University for their courses. We have it that way for the safety of our students and faculty members! It is NOT for the bogus, BS reasons that have been claimed here, that's for sure! Thanks for understanding! 24.78.138.224 (talk) 05:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus, BS "block" Pt. 2

What did our IP addresses do to warrant such treatment? We were not informed of any reason for that! This is a University IP address, and the students must be able to access their accounts for their studies. Blocking our IP address makes it MUCH harder on our students, as it doesn't just block it for your site, but for ALL the sites our students use, which is why blocking it is absolutely asinine! We require it to be unblocked immediately! Nobody at this highly prestigious University did anything wrong, and we do NOT appreciate being told that our IP address block appeal was nonsensical, when in actuality, the IP address block was nonsensical! If our IP addresses get blocked, then other sites that our students use for their studies do as well, and so it is INCREDIBLY crucial for us to not have our IP addresses blocked! We cannot say what we'll do differently, as no one here did anything wrong, so to change things up for false information would be completely pointless. Our students are required to let us higher ups know if anything ever happens like this so that we can deal with it and get it sorted out, which is why as the dean of this highly-esteemed university I am here doing just that! Preferably I would like to get this sorted out BEFORE we have to get the chancellor of our university involved! We were not told/informed anything about why our IP addresses were blocked, which is why this makes no sense! We've had many students try to make accounts using our IP addresses so that they could edit using them, but to no avail. We require our students to have accounts here for their studies, which is why we require our IP addresses to be unblocked immediately! Thanks in advance for unblocking our IP addresses! 24.78.138.224 (talk) 05:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can still read and access Wikipedia. No one disabled access to the site. You just can't EDIT and add WP:OR anymore. Mike Allen 05:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody added "original research" either! Even if anybody did edit, the thing that nobody did was add "original research", we have a bunch of fact-checkers here, so they'd know the difference between legitimately factual information- which is what they would've added, and so-called "original research", which isn't based on facts! Again, you're claiming lies and BS that never happened! If it wasn't for the fact-checkers of the world, this world would be in even more trouble than it already is, and so we're extremely proud to have so many legitimate fact-checkers attend this highly-esteemed University! Not allowing our students to edit goes against what our University stands for, and one way or another, you WILL allow us to do that again! We have a VERY strict rule against censorship here, and that is what you are doing with your bogus BS lies and misinformation! The fact-checkers are right in what they say, as they've done the research to back it up! It's time to accept that and remove our 100% wrongful "block"! Don't make me get the chancellor of our highly esteemed University involved! He's a VERY busy man, and so he'd prefer to not have to get involved, but if need be, he absolutely will come and have a "chat" to get this 100% wrongful block sorted out! 24.78.138.224 (talk) 05:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.78.138.224 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a University IP address, and was NOT used for the purposes that were claimed! This IP address was never blocked before, and so it's impossible for it to have been used for "block evasion", when it was never blocked in the first place! Even though we have multiple IP addresses, none of them would be used for purposes such as "block evasion"! This is libel against our fine establishment that has done nothing wrong! We were given no explanation as to what happened, or why such filthy, disgusting lies were made up about our highly esteemed University! We require this be sorted out and fixed immediately! Thank you for understanding! 24.78.138.224 (talk) 05:21, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you wish to make a sensible unblock request, one with a possibility of being accepted, please read WP:GAB. Yamla (talk) 07:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply to Yamla

Of COURSE you're going to cover your site's ass for making such a biased, bogus, BS wrongful "block" to our IP addresses! Covering without any sort of evidence that this- or any of our IP addresses- were blocked before, or even that it's "block evasion" (which it isn't)- is SO very typical! That's why- unless you have any sort of legitimate evidence that that happened (and you do not), then we will refuse to believe you! We will continue to appeal until a real, unbiased person realizes your HUGE mistake an unblocks us! Of course- in the meantime, if you have any legitimate evidence (and you don't), then please- DO share! But nothing you could share would prove that ANY of our IP addresses did any sort of "block evasion", because that never happened! This IP address was never blocked before, so it can't be used for "block evasion" when it was never blocked before now! Unless you have 100% legitimate, RELIABLE proof that it was used for those purposes (and you don't), then it didn't happen! There's also the fact that if if you did have possible proof it would immediately be proven false by what we've already stated, as even though we have multiple IP addresses, to our knowledge, none of ours are blocked, but even if somehow one was, we'd be doing the same to get that one unblocked, and not only that, because our students would have a different IP address depending on where they are located within our highly-esteemed University, even if one of the IP addresses they used was blocked, this one would not have been used as a means of "evading" any sort of block, as it wouldn't be intentional. Legitimate "block evasions" are 100% intentional, but it would not be intentional in this instance, as for safety reasons, we have multiple IP addresses in each area of the University, and considering these aren't immature high school kids, our students would know better than that, as these are highly intelligent men and women who are going to be doctors, nurses, lawyers, therapists, and other highly esteemed jobs someday! Regardless, we WILL continue to appeal until somebody with an unbiased mind realizes the mistake that was made and corrects it! 24.78.138.224 (talk) 08:07, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.78.138.224 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If we weren't informed by anybody as to what- if anything- even happened with our IP address that qualifies it as having wrongfully been used for "block evasion", then continuing to block without evidence is even more asinine! Unless there is proof (and there is not), then this is a 100% wrongful block! Blocking ANY of our IP addresses is against our highly esteemed University's rules! 24.78.138.224 (talk) 08:12, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining this nonsense request as it seems that you can't discuss this in a calm, civil manner. If you can't do that in your next request, you will lose talk page access. 331dot (talk) 10:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dropping that here after it was posted over at WP:RFP, as it seems to be kind of an unblock request. Lectonar (talk) 12:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Reason: This is a University IP address, and we need it unblocked after it was wrongfully blocked for no reason given to us. It is against the rules of our University to ban and/or block ANY of our IP addresses here, as our students require the usage of them for their studies. Because it was a wrongful IP address "block" in the first place, giving our IP address page protection was especially unnecessary! In other words- it was never needed to begin with! Factchecker994 (talk) 12:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)"[reply]

Oh, I was coming here to add this 'Factchecker994' sock account to the page. But looks like they beat me to it! Mike Allen 13:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.