User talk:24.181.125.234

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. CV9933 (talk) 17:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

What inappropriate link? 24.181.125.234 (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Why would you remove a more appropriate reference link? The current cited references are to internet archive, as opposed to the actual drug manufacturer's actual current website, which would have current PI. It makes no sense to list a reference to an archived webpage, versus the actual Prescribing Information from the pharmaceutical. There is nothing inappropriate about the link. It is also not for advertising or promotion. The link was a direct link to the drug for which the wikipedia page exists. You removal makes NO sense. There is no need to discuss it in talk. That is a waste of time. The present link is inappropriate as it references archived internet old material. 24.181.125.234 (talk) 17:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

The medication guide for patients AND the prescribing information on the present Wikipedia page is OUTDATED. It was correct as of 2010. The information I linked is CURRENT, and updated 12 years later than previous listed links and information is current as of 2022. Both the medication guide and prescribing information were revised 12/2022. 24.181.125.234 (talk) 17:49, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

---