User talk:23impartial

Welcome!

Hello, 23impartial!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, PigeonChickenFish (talk) 06:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 23impartial (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 20:46, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StartOkayStop was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StartOkayStop (talk) 00:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 23impartial! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! StartOkayStop (talk) 00:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki has been accepted

Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:21, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, 23impartial. Thank you for your work on Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Hey! I just finished reviewing three of your articles on SCOTUS cases. I'm really happy someone is working to get them on Wikipedia. If you ever need a hand please feel free to reach out. I've only really worked on one court case article here but I enjoyed it and wouldn't mind helping out if I can be of use. Your work is important and keep it up! Dr vulpes (Talk) 12:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! :) 23impartial (talk) 18:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, 23impartial. Thank you for your work on Detroit Public Theatre. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tidying up with WikiProject Medicine

Hi 23impartial, despite your professed interest in theatre and law topics, I see you occasionally bumping into medicine topics and doing some tidying. I just wanted to reach out to welcome you into the medicine sphere here and ask for help on a tidying project.

First, welcome! Feel free to contribute at WT:MED, where we could always use more help! If you see medicine-related issues that need to be resolved, feel free to post there as well to mobilize editors.

Second, we're currently trying to help WikiProject Unreferenced Articles with their November backlog drive. There are just 110 unreferenced medicine articles left (that we know of). If you've got a bit of time, take a look at the list and see if you could help out with a few. Just a single reference is sufficient to remove the unreferenced tag (though further clean-up is always welcome). Any help is appreciated. Either way, I hope to see you around the medicine articles. Best, Ajpolino (talk) 22:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I will start working on the unreferenced articles! 23impartial (talk) 12:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Human Rights Revival

Hi! I recently posted at WikiProject Human rights about the lack of activity on the project and its being labeled as "semi-active". I noticed that you are a member of the project, and would like to get your input if possible. See my post on the Talk page, and if you have insight into possibly reviving the project or have any thoughts about it, feel free to comment. Thanks! Spookyaki (talk) 22:13, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit reverted

Just letting you know that this edit was rightly reverted[1], looking at the context it shouldn't have been made in the first place. I hope you understand. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:40, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]