User talk:21agoodaker

Welcome!

Hello, 21agoodaker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DanielRigal (talk) 23:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Worst Films

Hi there. I saw that you are adding to the List of films considered the worst. You need to be a careful here. To belong on that list the film has to be well referenced as being described as the "worst ever" or something very similar. "Worst of the year" definitely doesn't cut it. "Worst of the decade" probably doesn't. "Worst of its genre" might be OK but only for very major genres. If we allowed all those "worst of the year" movies in then the list would get too long for anybody to ever read it and that wouldn't do anybody any good. So, yes, the Emoji Move probably is pretty awful (I'm certainly not going to watch it just to check) but it probably doesn't belong on the list. I hope this helps. There are also helpful links in the welcome message above. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Star (2017 film), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't create non-neutral categories, such as Category:Worst films of all time and Category:Rip-off films. Per our guideline on categories, we don't create ones that are subjective. This would include categories that label something as the best, worst, a rip off, most original, etc. Before you create any more categories, you might want to get some more experience editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:07, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rip-off films has been nominated for discussion

Category:Rip-off films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from several Wikipedia articles to List of films considered the worst (your additions have since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:31, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Everyone's Hero. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted several of your recent edits. You're adding unsourced production companies and removing ones that are cited to reliable sources. Please see this consensus that production companies require sourcing. Wikipedia is based on what reliable sources say, not what we believe to be true. Some people look at posters, trailers, and other promotional material, then copy down all the companies that they see listed. This is problematic because we don't know which ones of those companies were actually involved in the production of the film. Some people also copy whatever is listed in the IMDb. This is problematic because it's user-generated content and thus not considered authoritative enough for use on Wikipedia. If you have trouble identifying reliable sources, please feel free to ask for help at WikiProject Film, a central forum for people who enjoy editing articles about films. We can help you. If you continue to disruptively remove sourced content and add unsourced content, it is likely you will end up blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:NewYTchannelThumb.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:NewYTchannelThumb.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talking Kitty Cat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talking Kitty Cat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 22:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Lego Ninjago Movie. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Columbia Pictures films. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Angry Birds Movie. You've been repeated warned for this. Stop changing sourced content and adding unsourced content. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:29, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Sausage Party. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at The Angry Birds Movie. You've been warned enough for this. Stop your disruptive edits. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:31, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 21agoodaker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 21agoodaker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:LGBT Atheists has been nominated for discussion

Category:LGBT Atheists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 19:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caldwell County Schools (Kentucky) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Caldwell County Schools (Kentucky), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 22:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Caldwell County Schools (Kentucky) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Caldwell County Schools (Kentucky), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of VidLii

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on VidLii requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hug^syrup 14:55, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

VidLii moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, VidLii, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 16:32, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Caldwell County Schools (Kentucky)

Hello, 21agoodaker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Caldwell County Schools".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at The_Lego_Movie_2:_The_Second_Part instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:21agoodaker/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:21agoodaker/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 21agoodaker! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 22:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:21agoodaker/sandbox

Hello, 21agoodaker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 00:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:VidLii

Hello, 21agoodaker. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:VidLii, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:VidLii

Hello, 21agoodaker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "VidLii".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 16:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:21agoodaker

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:21agoodaker, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Heather Leviara (aka Green 34) 13:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]