User talk:218.212.76.59

328

This is the user talk page for 218.212.76.59 (Python303's IP address).

218.212.76.59

218.212.76.59 218.212.76.59 (talk) 07:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock/unlock request for Faster328

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

218.212.76.59 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Root reason for block: Not enough competence. I tried to do what experienced editors wanted me to do but my interest in adding precise values took over me. My main Faster328 account is now on Wikidata. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. I will learn from experienced editors.

Many handling admins said: As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. You can follow the guide at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks.

But I do not prefer to appeal using my IP's talk page, so I will use this site for my appeal.

Decline reason:

Please request unblock from your account. 331dot (talk) 08:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User Faster328 is globally locked. I cannot log in to my account. 218.212.76.59 (talk) 08:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I want to unblock and unlock my account, Faster328, in Wikipedia.

My reason is:

Root reason for block: Not enough competence. I tried to do what experienced editors wanted me to do but my interest in adding precise values took over me. My main Faster328 account is now on Wikidata. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. I will learn from experienced editors.

Many handling admins said: As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. You can follow the guide at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks.

But I do not prefer to appeal using my IP's talk page, so I will use this site for my appeal.

Additional notes:

Root reason for block: Not enough competence. I tried to do what experienced editors wanted me to do but my interest in adding precise values took over me. My main Faster328 account is now on Wikidata. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. I will learn from experienced editors.

Due to my cross-account contributions to Wikimedia projects, I am a beginner learning how to use an account. I often use one account more than the other account on each of my devices. I created two accounts for both devices. If one of my accounts is compromised, I will use the other account made for the same device, to maintain extra security. But I already have strong passwords (as for now). In the far future, black hat hackers could easily use the accounts and to crack strong passwords instantly, for money. Passwords containing more characters are stronger.

JJMC89 said: I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that either the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks for more information.

If the sock-puppet accounts are inactive for more than 6 months, the socks would been merged with the main account for each device.

All future cases of sockpuppet investigations and reports involving the 4 accounts should be merged to case with sockmaster Python303, and filed with sock-master's name equals to Python303, respectively.

What I most likely violated was: An editor using multiple accounts for valid reasons should, on each account's user page, list all the other accounts with an explanation of their purpose. Optionally, the user and user talk pages of some of the accounts can be redirected to those of another. Editors who use unlinked alternative accounts, or who edit as an IP address editor separate from their account, should carefully avoid any crossover on articles or topics because even innocuous activities such as copy editing, wikifying, or linking might be considered sockpuppetry in some cases and innocuous intentions will not usually serve as an excuse.

This might have been led to admin David Eppstein on the English Wikipedia filing a sockpuppet investigation with sockmaster Faster328. I didn't realise there was a sockpuppet investigation involving Faster328 and Numbers-Mathworld, until I was blocked form editing the English Wikipedia. What David Eppstein was trying to do was to was to delete the article Power of five (exponentiation) because it was created by an unlinked sock account of Faster328. I'd preferred to put my account base in the page User:Python303. The community thinks that I most likely violated a crossover in topic using multiple accounts.

Sorry for the incovienence I caused to admin David Eppstein on the English Wikipedia.

After all that, I will link the accounts in an account base in Python303's user page. My true abuse was only in the English Wikibooks. I think that the accounts could be more legit when I gain more experience from experienced editors from then.

I felt sorry to David Eppstein for using an unlinked alternative account. My true abuse is only in the English Wikibooks, and the abuse type is vandalism. 218.212.76.59 (talk) 07:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a result for being blocked from editing on Wikipedia, I abused the English Wikibooks. 218.212.76.59 (talk) 07:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Userbase in User:Python303

Once unlocked, add the following userbase table below:

Python303's Accounts
Python303's users	User	Raw account name	Date created (UTC)
Main Account	Python303	python303/Python303	20 April 2023
Oldest Account	Faster328	faster328	29 March 2023
Mobile Account	Numbers-Mathworld	Numbers-Mathworld	7 April 2023
Mobile Alternative Account	Numbers-1427701207.	Numbers-1427701207.	22 April 2023

This will help me recognise my sockpuppet accounts.

Userbase page: User:Python303

218.212.76.59 (talk) 07:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Display style for User:Faster328

Add the following for User:Faster328's user page.

{{DISPLAYTITLE:User:<font face="Cooper Black" color="#000000">{{Color|#00bfff|Faster}}{{Color|#8cff00|328}}}}

This will be the display style for my user account.

218.212.76.59 (talk) 07:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 09:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will have to wait 31 hours to unblock my account using my talk page. 218.212.76.59 (talk) 09:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should not be using this page as you have an account. Evading your block only makes it harder to unblock your account and have a steward lift the global lock. You must stop editing Wikipedia anywhere other than your account. 331dot (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't prefer to edit anonymously. 218.212.76.59 (talk) 00:33, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If my account is compromised, I may edit logged in in an uncompromised account. 218.212.76.59 (talk) 00:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to edit via an account, you need to get it unblocked. If it's compromised, see WP:COMPROMISED. You shouldn't just create a new account. 331dot (talk) 06:31, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go to UTRS2 and copy the appeal key below. Alternatively, you can type in the key.

The appeal key is: ebe6215b4f367922699e1430be31b6a2ee3d95bf735a7f353ad48e4d2d40fd4204a5ee24f95349cc92ab358df7efac7d90da60962fb32885f5a8033b13537e8b

This is the appeal for one of my accounts, Faster328, often referred as the sockmaster by SPI clerks, like this report, but numerous other reports think that Numbers-Mathworld is the sockmaster, like this report.

If the socks have been inactive for 6 months or more, the socks will be merged to the sockmaster account. For example, if the sock JohnDoe2 is inactive for 6 months, the account will be merged to the suspected sockmaster, JohnDoe. 218.212.76.59 (talk) 06:47, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no technical means of "merging" accounts. The point here is that however you want to edit in the future, you must get your initial account unblocked first. The block is on you personally, not just your account. You may not edit under any account or IP until the block on your initial account is removed- which gets harder to do with every post you make while evading your block. I am now removing access to this page and extending the block. 331dot (talk) 07:07, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 01:05, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is the block evasion? 218.212.76.59 (talk) 01:35, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 07:07, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to lift my global lock.

ebe6215b4f367922699e1430be31b6a2ee3d95bf735a7f353ad48e4d2d40fd4204a5ee24f95349cc92ab358df7efac7d90da60962fb32885f5a8033b13537e8b

is my lock appeal key for my original account. 218.212.76.59 (talk) 07:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

If your account is globally locked, you must contact a steward to get it removed. The more you evade your block, the less likely that is to happen. We can do nothing for you here locally until a steward removes the global lock. 331dot (talk) 08:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have a UTRS appeal waiting.

ebe6215b4f367922699e1430be31b6a2ee3d95bf735a7f353ad48e4d2d40fd4204a5ee24f95349cc92ab358df7efac7d90da60962fb32885f5a8033b13537e8b

is my lock appeal key. 218.212.76.59 (talk) 00:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not post your appeal key here. This compromises your UTRS request. --Yamla (talk) 10:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I am blocked on metawiki with no TPA. 218.212.76.59 (talk) 00:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.