Jump to content

User talk:216.30.158.95

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi 216.30.158.95! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Please don't mention non-notable children by name, or give their exact birth dates. Meters (talk) 19:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The kids names aren't a secret. There are celebrities who have kids names on theirs that shouldn't so why is it any different here? They've used their kids in music videos and post pictures of them all over social media. Their names have also been on wiki up until this year. 216.30.158.95 (talk) 20:03, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From looking at this on wiki: That person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A (unless significant coverage can be found on A); relationships do not confer notability. However, person A may be included in the related article on B. The children are not getting a stand alone article and are mentioned in their parents band article under the section with each of their fathers therefor I think it is okay to mention them by name in the article for their parents. Nina878787 (talk) 20:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The place to discuss this is on the article's talk page, not here. The IP has the choice of doing that and attempting to get consensus, of leaving it alone, or of almost certainly being blocked for edit warring. Meters (talk) 20:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The IP can add in their thoughts to a section I made on the article's talk page where I brought up this topic with what I found. Nina878787 (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As I said on the article's talk page, you seem to misunderstand the issue. Meters (talk) 21:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hanson (band)

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Antique Rose 19:53, 23 March 2021 (UTC)