User talk:216.230.42.71

December 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2076, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

August 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2078 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2078 was changed by 216.230.42.71 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.984555 on 2019-08-11T05:31:00+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:31, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2079. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:25, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at 2020, you may be blocked from editing. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:23, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Look, if it were important, someone other than news media on a slow news day would say it was important. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you assume ownership of articles, as you did at 2020. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Would you please stop removing the importance tags. The "doomsday clock" already has a discussion in Talk:2020, and "the mummy speaks" may deserve a listing in 2020 in science, but not in the main article. Most of the other entries probably don't belong, but these are among the worst. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello, I'm LuK3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Male privilege have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:13, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---