User talk:212.95.5.218

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Joseph Bonaparte into Jean Baptiste Alexandre Strolz. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

March 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wallace and Gromit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FranklinOfNull (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bambi, a Life in the Woods, you may be blocked from editing. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 19:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

---