User talk:209.64.168.66
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
December 2014
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Transsexualism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Transsexualism was changed by 209.64.168.66 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89728 on 2014-12-03T20:14:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Transsexualism , you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
January 2015
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tomatillo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tomatillo was changed by 209.64.168.66 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958599 on 2015-01-14T15:25:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tomatillo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. : Noyster (talk), 15:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
October 2016
[edit]Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cloud Gate— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cloud Gate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
December 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm Kleuske. I noticed that you recently removed content from Deflategate without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 19:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Deflategate, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Deflategate, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Biddydrain (talk) 20:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Deflategate shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 20:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Favonian (talk) 20:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
April 2018
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Oni has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Oni was changed by 209.64.168.66 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942979 on 2018-04-09T15:26:22+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:26, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |