User talk:208.104.222.85

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Charlotte, North Carolina. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Loodog (talk) 02:55, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Charlotte, North Carolina. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Loodog (talk) 03:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Charlotte, North Carolina

The page has been locked until the edit dispute can be settled. Please present reasoned arguments on the talk page for your viewpoint that do not have to do with the editors working on the article.--Loodog (talk) 04:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Charlotte, North Carolina

Your next revert on Charlotte, North Carolina will get you reported to WP:ANI. If you want to constructively change the article, please offer your arguments on the talk page.--Loodog (talk) 00:32, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Charlotte, North Carolina

Editor, I'm afraid you don't understand consensus on wikipedia. When editors working on a page more or less agree to a position on how an article should be kept, that choice is respected. In order to change the article, you must make convincing arguments on the article's talk page that will change that consensus. Simply changing the page because it is your wish does you no good and will get you blocked. This is how wikipedia works. If you disagree with this policy, you are welcome to leave wikipedia and go elsewhere. You have been given plenty warning regarding edit warring and it would be in your best interests to try to demonstrate that you are willing to communicate with regular users to come to a compromise. If you do not, you will be reverted and then blocked.--Loodog (talk) 05:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

---