User talk:207.183.181.238

June 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Spalding–Rigdon theory of Book of Mormon authorship, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. SmittenGalaxy (talk) 15:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

re: 207.183.181.238 (talk · contribs) Those weren't weasel words or editorialising; quoting experts who give their own editorial opinions isn't editorialising, it's a bedrock of Wikipedia writing, as is laid out very explicitly in policy. And "most historians" isn't weasel words, it's a description of academic consensus. If your contention is that academic consensus doesn't exist, that's a separate issue, but you need to say that that's your contention (rather than objecting to the very idea that academic consensus can exist) and back it up with some evidence. --AntiDionysius (talk) 15:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.