User talk:206.167.168.128

August 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 13:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's cute so basically you allow lies and misleads to be the norm. and then you wonder why wikipedia is not a respected source of information. You will never be considered as a reliable source of information when you choose what pleases only a certain few

Please undo your recent edits. Otherwise I will have to take it to WP:ANI/3RR. Sro23 (talk) 15:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No i provided references, if its hurting your feelings and you cant accept the truth I wont let you change it. You are just proving that Wikipedia is nothing more than slightly more civilised 4chan

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:206.167.168.128 reported by User:Sro23 (Result: ). Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 17:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as done at Scion tC. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2017

Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Weeknd— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 21:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.