User talk:205.210.253.12

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Catgut (talk) 20:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Pittsburgh Penguins roster, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Template:Pittsburgh Penguins roster was changed by 205.210.253.12 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-06-13T03:51:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eganville, Ontario, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [midnight comet] [contribs] 21:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jon Koppenhaver, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jon Koppenhaver was changed by 205.210.253.12 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-12-02T15:33:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:33, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tim Deegan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to David Pratt (Canadian broadcaster) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Rrburke^ekrubrR 22:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Bryant

If a media outlet publishes an article specifically accusing Richard Peck of a conflict of interest in the Bryant case, that would merit mention in the article. But it's not appropriate to use Wikipedia to create the perception of a conflict by piecing together sources to create an original research claim that hasn't already been made in the media. It's not our role or our job to accuse him of a conflict unless and until a reliable media source does so first. Bearcat (talk) 18:53, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bearcat, i did include a link to a news story in the Vancouver Sun "a division of canwest publishing" which has been around since 1912. how is that not reliable?

It's not enough to simply provide a link stating that Peck made a political donation to Wally Oppal — the BC Liberals and the Liberal Party of Ontario are not the same thing, for starters, and according to the article the donation wasn't even to the BC Liberal party as a whole anyway, but to Oppal's individual campaign. What you would need to provide is a link which specifically states that somebody has specifically accused Peck of a specific conflict of interest; the link you added would only be okay if the article itself asserted a link between that donation and his role in the Bryant case. Bearcat (talk) 19:10, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page CKST has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Christina Silverman (talk) 04:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to PowerDVD. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 16:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Waldeck, Saskatchewan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 19:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kit Kat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 02:46, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Jeff Marek has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jobbie Nooner with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -down load ׀ email 19:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chipotle Mexican Grill, you may be blocked from editing. Angryapathy (talk) 20:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm Alcmaeonid. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Coquitlam, because it didn't appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Alcmaeonid (talk) 19:36, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Amy's Arms.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) (coi) 16:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Amy's Arms concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Amy's Arms, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Lance Bass , but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Puslinch, Ontario because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Amy's Arms

Hello 205.210.253.12. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Amy's Arms".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Amy's Arms}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm WNYY98. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Shawn Mendes, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WNYY98 (talk) 14:28, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm Rubbish computer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Miss Universe 2015, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 18:54, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24h for vandalism--Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.[reply]

August 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page InnerSPACE has been reverted.
Your edit here to InnerSPACE was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/SPACEchannel/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:50, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

September 2017

Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Joe Mande— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. 🖉←} 23:05, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kirk Cousins have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.