User talk:203.214.1.196

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, 203-214-1-196.perm.iinet.net.au (203.214.1.196), is registered to iiNet Limited and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Recent edit to HP-12C

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! : Noyster (talk), 09:05, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lobotomy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lobotomy was changed by 203.214.1.196 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866266 on 2016-03-31T11:23:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Gilliam (talk) 11:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

July 2017

Thank you for your contributions to Cyber-nationalism, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Ultrafinitism, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yo mannn, waddup? Me edit was true as mud bro! Like, Chen's the overlord, bro, know what I'm sayin'? Dude, WDYCTBG is a great part of his research bro, it unites us all ultra-finitists doing God's work bro and slays the evil-speakers of the lie that numbers don't end. We need to get what the numbers-don't-end people are doing, mannn, and why they're like that, know what I'm saying chap? Like, you look down upon His word at this Wikipedia outfit mannn? Like, is that some bait for me bro? Dude, c'mon man! Know the facts, it is Truth, with capital T muh dude! WDYCTBG is the Holiest truth man, it is essential research to ultrafinitism and a core solid mutha-fucken' part of the religious truth muh hood buddy. Checkin' out now man, see ya round in the hood me elf. Cheerio. You know whadda to do - put the Truth back to its former glory dude!

September 2019

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Onager (weapon)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 09:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Thank you for your contributions to S6 (classification), but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Muffin of the English (talk) 13:16, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tridacninae, you may be blocked from editing. WhitePhosphorus (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Yaris678 (talk) 13:24, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.214.1.196 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here... Age of Empires videogame edits primarily. Extremely popular and important game with exceptional historical exemplars. Factual descriptions and accurate visual depictions. Believe block was firmly in error. Though I did make a false reference to elves and gnomes. Swimming is real and not just mythological, I know.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)~~#User Comments# I agree to, and understand, the above. I hereby promise to cease disruptive and/or damaging editing activities on Wikimedia platforms, and that I will seek to enhance the value of these platforms through useful contributions and edits. #End User Comments#17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)~~

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla, the user is trying to make amends but is doing so in a technically incorrect way, so I'm pinging you to make you aware of it. I have no opinion on the matter. Thanks. 209.51.172.142 (talk) 16:41, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

-- Thank you, Mr. (Mrs.?) 209.51.172.142! How should I have done this? Another unblock request? 17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)17:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here -- please refer above to Mr./Mrs. IP address dude, my user comments, and the tag to based Yamla. 203.214.1.196 (talk) 11:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.214.1.196 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Hi, could I get an unblock please, as per the info provided at the bottom of my talk page? Flagged here so that I can easily reference my commentary in the last unblock request regarding my sworn promise to add value to Wikimedia projects. I am indeed making amends, or at least I am currently trying to make good with admins/moderators/editors/etc. Cheers! 203.214.1.196 (talk) 07:18, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your previous request was missing a bracket which is likely why it was not seen. You will need to address the reason for the block as Yamla indicated, and describe the nature of the productive contributions you will make if unblocked. As this request does not do that, I am declining it. 203.214.1.196 (talk) 12:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC) 331dot (talk) 10:27, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pinging 331dot (talk) and Yamla and Mr./Mrs. IP Address dude/ette at 203.214.1.196 (talk!!

-- I don't understand what you mean. Could you please clarify for me? Reason for the block? Which post of mine was the reason for my block? I promise not to do it again. It wasn't my Age of Empires related comments, was it? And I am a mathematician and philosopher - I can add content to various pages in these realms given my in-depth training and expertise. --

Unless requested, this is not a place to draft articles while you are blocked. I have moved your comment from inside the unblock request to the outside, and will place new posts at the bottom as is standard practice. 331dot (talk) 14:00, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a talk page. Please respect the talk page guidelines, and remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes (203.214.1.196 (talk) 14:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)).[reply]

Oh, I just copied and pasted to get admin attention by making talk page changes and flagging. Also, 331dot, did you know the yellow-bibbed lory (Lorius chlorocercus) is a species of parrot in the family Psittaculidae and that it is endemic to the southern Solomon Islands? Pretty cool, huh?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.214.1.196 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I won't edit S6 again, making reference to mythological characters, and I won't slight the Catholic church again despite my personal distaste, as I understand you're running a factual and ostensibly neutral wiki here. Cheerio lads/. 203.214.1.196 (talk) 13:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Every edit from this IP has been vandalism. I see no reason to unblock and much reason to keep blocked. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Have any admins ever been blocked, guys? 203.214.1.196 (talk) 14:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dodecanal has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dodecanal was changed by 203.214.1.196 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959421 on 2020-01-19T18:21:45+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alfred Eckhold. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 18:27, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Depression (mood), you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.214.1.196 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here 203.214.1.196 (talk) 22:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC) Looking to contribute recent research to several mathematics pages. Not sure who made the edits on this public IP. Also, it appears Wikipedia doesn't care about the mental health of its users. I checked the depression page edit and that was so obviously a request by the user for a positive discussion. This comment of mine moments ago on this page was rolled back, further validating this comment. Please unblock, to allow for discussion, and to allow for positive contributions to mathematics research documentation on Wikipedia.[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked for trolling. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at OnlyFans, you may be blocked from editing. ;; Maddy ♥︎(they/she)♥︎ :: talk 06:47, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at OnlyFans. Endwise (talk) 06:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Physical constant. Wikipedialuva (talk) 07:34, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.