User talk:2021music

Hi, I see that my addition to the Edgard Varese list of external links has been undone by Ally D. The Pytheas Center for Contemporary Music's listings are fluid and always open for expansion. Since the Varese Wikipedia link was first edited the Pytheas Center's webpage has been revised to include many articles and information not collected anywhere else. I do DISAGREE with Ally D that the Pytheas list has minimal content and maximal advertising. One of the main goals of the Pytheas Center is to organize widely disbursed information relevant to a particular composer or music group/association, thereby making exploration of the subject much easier. The advertising that appears on the Pytheas page is there so that Pytheas can exist on the web. Our budget at this point in time is $0, so we must rely on Bravenet and its advertisers for "support". Any listing or links on Pytheas pages is there because of the possibility of FREE access to those exploring a particular composer or group. Therefore, last.fm, Rhapsody, The New York Times and other commercial sites are listed because they make SOME streaming audio and related informational articles available to everyone FOR FREE. All the more resources for those exploring music that is new to them. I will be returning the Pytheas link to the Wikipedia Edgard Varese page. Please let me know of any other concerns regarding this link addition. Thank you - 2021music 2021music (talk) 00:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a comment and cross-link to your above comments to the Talk:Edgard Varèse page to seek others' views on this issue. AllyD (talk) 17:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

welcome and wp:coi

Hello, greetings and welcome to wikipedia!. Your additions appear to be in good faith, and I hope you will stick around and contribute to wikipedia for time to come ;). However, you should refrain from adding links with which you have a conflict of interest 2021, as proposed by the wikipedia community -- see wikipedia:conflict of interest . Regardless of whether the links are appropriate, you should not be adding links to sites with which you are professionally involved. Again, hope you stick around -- feel free to drop any questions my way. Standard welcome follows:

Welcome!

Hello, 2021music, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ∴ here…♠ 07:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Louise Ashford (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emma Louise Ashford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Emma Louise Ashford, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 16:37, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2021music! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noahfgodard (talk) 16:37, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Louise Ashford (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Emma Louise Ashford instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is already an article on Ashford. This draft has more information and many more references, and should be folded into the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emma Louise Ashford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Emma Louise Ashford, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Emma Louise Ashford

Hello, 2021music. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Emma Louise Ashford, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:09, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]