User talk:2012Olympian/Archives/2008/September
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:2012Olympian, for the period Time period of archived discussion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Why didn't you notify me of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promenade Pictures as the template calls for? Corvus cornixtalk 23:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
The only reason I found it was because I happened to be looking through the AfD page. Corvus cornixtalk 00:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback on my article and your statement of support. Wikipedia is fun and educational and I am enjoying being part of the community. I appreciate your making me feel welcome. Gchuva (talk) 00:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for getting that.
I reverted the wrong change. -- Scarpy (talk) 16:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Re:warn on opium
That was due to an edit conflict, and I've restored your version. However, in the future, please, instead of templating me, just come to my talk page and ask why I did it. Even if it's blatant vandalism, instead of tarnishing my reputation with a misplaced warning template, ask me what happened. With a newer editor, obviously, revert and template. But with a more experienced user, it's always better to bypass templates and see what went wrong. miquonranger03 (talk) 05:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- You might be surprised how far people will dig in editor review and RfA. miquonranger03 (talk) 06:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Battle of Chawinda
Hey Advocate hope your well i need some help regarding the article on Battle of Chawinda recently a pro indian editor Nichalp has reverted the page putting his pro india stance in the war info box claiming Pakistan only repelled the attack while the article clearly states india lost the battle which is started the page was stable for several months but since Nichalp has arrived its been changed from Decisive Pakistan victory to Pakistan repelled the attack could you please change it to its neutral factual base please cheers 86.153.131.220 (talk) 10:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
PAK
sorry to bother you again but a editor named kashmircloud has reverted the neutral edits on PAK and added his pro india edits in the article he seems to be pushing only his pro indian POV by diverting the articles name into POK and misleading readers so can you do anything to block or warn him and stop him from vandalising PAK article again cheers 86.156.214.251 (talk) 14:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)