User talk:201226nick

September 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as User talk:Thinker78 are strictly for discussing the topic of their associated main pages and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about unrelated topics. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:04, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what to do. 201226nick (talk) 20:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Welcome! I noticed you came to say hi to my talk page. If you have questions I would be happy to guide you! Thinker78 (talk) 20:13, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi 201226nick! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Thinker78 (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

confused😫 201226nick (talk) 20:18, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How come? Thinker78 (talk) 22:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

where do I edit stuff? 201226nick (talk) 23:10, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Check the links in the information above, they have good information about editing and other useful things as well. Thinker78 (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok thank u 201226nick (talk) 18:32, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suppressed edits

Hi, 201226nick, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! Mz7 (talk) 20:44, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to know how to do that 201226nick (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can't. Only Oversighters can do that, and you clearly aren't ready to become one. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:54, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

😭when can I 201226nick (talk) 20:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. After years of experience probably! Thinker78 (talk) 18:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's gonna be hard since I am still in school, But ok 201226nick (talk) 16:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:12, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please unblock me I'm sorry I'll be nice please please I am so sorry I will tell SPECIFICO sorry please 201226nick (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, read above to properly add an unblock appeal. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:21, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why I should be unblocked

I will never be mean again I will say sorry and will be nice 201226nick (talk) 18:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LuK3: I think 201226nick has potential to be a good contributor to Wikipedia. I urge you to reconsider your block.

I have experienced much incivility even gross rudeness by long-time editors and such behavior for some reason is tolerated without even a reminder of the civility policy. User:201226nick has been looking for friends and placing wikilove messages and barnstars from the get go. As such, I would consider them a needed addition to the Wikipedia community. In fact I would like to recruit them for the Wikipedia:Kindness Campaign if the block is lifted, which can be on a conditional basis per WP:CONDUNBLOCK.

According to Wikimedia, Metapedianism, "is the philosophy of focusing on the internal workings of Wikimedia projects, including guidelines and policies, and the social side of the Wikimedia movement". "Metapedians are often seen as the "social gadflies" of Wikimedia projects, doing honourable work and civic duties: giving out Barnstars, having general conversations on Talk Pages." Aside from discussions related to policies and guidelines. I think lifting the morale of Wikipedia editors should be a core meta endeavour of the inner workings of the project. Thinker78 (talk) 00:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I kinda disagree with this. They violated WP:NOTAFORUM multiple times on multiple people's talk pages. Sure they are trying to be nice, but general chit-chat is completely against the entire purpose of Wikipedia. If Luk3 decides to unblock them per what Thinker said above I have no strong objections. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 00:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A new user doesn't know the rules. I noticed even a little spam in Specifico's talk. Probably not as vandalism or with intention of spamming unreasonably, but trying to get attention of the editor for a response. Given the appeal of the block, if they were warned beforehand likely they wouldn't continue doing it (although I understand that unfortunately it is common practice to just block at once in this cases). I believe that maybe with some guidance the blocked user has potential. Nothing is lost with a conditional unblock, except maybe some time blocking again in case it doesn't work, but a good editor could be gained if it works. I see more benefit than risk. Thinker78 (talk) 02:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, although I do have some concerns regarding WP:CIR towards them. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What WP:CIR concerns do you have? The user pretty quickly learned how to give barnstars and mostly was asking for friendship. I would point out WP:CIRNOT. Thinker78 (talk) 04:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My main concerns are regarding the fact that they don't (or didn't) seem to understand that they should not be posting personal info her on Wikipedia. My other concern is regarding that personal info. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going into too much detail cause, well, it's related to personal info. If the editor can prove that they understand why they shouldn't post personal info and will try (i'm not saying that they will since we're humans) to not post their personal info then I am willing to believe they can edit constructively. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We all make mistakes. Something evident for some may not be evident to others. After all, I used to have cybersecurity training each year. You also have some personal info that could be used for social engineering purposes. : / Thinker78 (talk) 02:15, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well the issue I have with it was they did it once, were told not to do it again, and then proceeded to do it again. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I didn't notice that. But sometimes users don't read the notice before reverting a revert. I don't know. Thinker78 (talk) 17:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Like I said if the user can prove they can contribute constructively without revealing their personal info then I have no strong objections to unblocking them. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:40, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dont worry about him he is me 201226nick2 (talk) 20:36, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And I am not here to socialize only here to view info. 201226nick2 (talk) 20:37, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And I am sorry for getting u mixed up in this situation thinker thirty eight and blaze wolf 201226nick2 (talk) 20:40, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a sockpuppet account to evade your block (now blocked indef) is not helping your case. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:34, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well now I have a very strong objection to unblocking if they're just gonna sockpuppet. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry is a very obscure policy for new users. It took me many years to know about it. And the user was forthcoming, they didn't try to hide the fact, evidence it was not done with bad faith. Thinker78 (talk) 02:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eh... It sounds like it'd be common sense that if you were blocked that creating a new account would be a bad idea. I'm sorry but I really do not think this user should be unblocked if they're just going to create an alt and evade their block. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what

what 201226nick (talk) 18:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As stated above, you've been blocked for continuous WP:NOTHERE behavior, specifically treating Wikipedia as a social network. If you would like to appeal this block, please read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and Wikipedia:Appealing a block. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please unblock me I'm sorry I'll be nice please please I am so sorry I will tell SPECIFICO sorry please 201226nick (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why I should be unblocked

I will never be mean again I will say sorry and will be nice 201226nick (talk) 18:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest reading competence is required. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

could u help me get unblocked 201226nick (talk) 18:51, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:54, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i'm crying for real i just want friends 201226nick (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really care that you are crying for real. You are treating Wikipedia as a social network which is not even close to what Wikipedia is for. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:02, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i am done using wiki 201226nick (talk) 19:05, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have problems making friends in real life i thought i should do it this way 201226nick (talk) 19:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I get it. I also have problems with making friends in real life. However, the issue was you chose Wikipedia as the place where you'd try and make friends which unfortunately was not the correct choice to make. Once you have matured a little more (I'm not saying this to mean you're immature, I'm just choosing my words carefully here so I don't accidentally disclose personal info) I suggest checking out websites like Discord which is designed around what you are wanting to do. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

my computer is locked down i can only use like this 201226nick (talk) 19:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's probably for good reason, hence why I said "once you have matured a little more". For now, I suggest you stay off of Wikipedia (unless you're using it for browsing articles) for a few years and come back once you feel you have matured a little more if you are interested in editing. There's also a website known as Fandom which is similar to Wikipedia except for the fact that usually things don't have to be verified and you can communicate with general chat like you are trying to do here. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

let me know if u cant 201226nick (talk) 19:45, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is extremely important that you do not post any personal information, including contact details, anywhere on Wikipedia. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:55, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
shut up 201226nick (talk) 19:56, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do not tell anyone to shut up. Especially not an administrator like Ponyo. You do realize that if you post personal info here on Wikipedia that anyone can see it, including those with malicious intent. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:58, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Since you TPA has been disabled I will leave you with this: Be very careful with what you tell people about yourself online as for all you know it could be someone who is trying to get close to you so that they can possibly do very bad things to you. Anything you post on the internet is there forever, even if it is seemingly deleted if someone was desperate enough there will most likely be a way they can get that info. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #63403

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Try a website

201226nick you wanted to make friends? Try this other website, also founded by the founder of Wikipedia, but specifically made as a social network. https://wt.social/ Cheers! Thinker78 (talk) 04:30, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]