User talk:2011Windows7SP1

NCCC Malls moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NCCC Malls, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NCCC Malls (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two of the references are primary sources, and the rest do not meet the criteria outlined by WP:CORPDEPTH.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NCCC Malls and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NCCC Malls, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2011Windows7SP1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of shopping malls in the Philippines. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NCCC Malls (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources still do not satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. If the GMA Network story led to non-trivial follow up about the company and its operations, there would be potential. The new Sun Star Davao coverage is too routine in nature, and it relies too heavily on what the company and its principals say.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NCCC Malls and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NCCC Malls, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you double check which it needs more sourced? You people are just consistently rejecting when it already it had multiple sources since its last edit. If this happens again, I recommend debating this on speedy deletion contest rather than putting it here on my user page. 2011Windows7SP1 (talk) 00:34, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With the Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) guideline, coverage about openings, new services, mergers, etc. is considered routine, lacking significant depth of coverage. Sources based on what the subject or its personnel say don't count as independent coverage. Only one of the 5 citations (GMA Network) meets the independent reliable source test, and that one lacks significant coverage about the company. Deletion is the remedy of last resort, when an article cannot be improved. As noted above, there is potential, and just as important, there is time. Again, please see the WP:CORPDEPTH standard for articles about companies. It is meant to distinguish real coverage from hype and churnalism. • Gene93k (talk) 11:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt notice that. Sorry. Might be trying adding one in the next couple days. I didnt notice that. I thought this was almost WP:NPOV issue until i read the reply. 2011Windows7SP1 (talk) 11:39, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppettry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2011Windows7SP1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This was in error. I did created the page by accident without knowing it can block the account. I will not continue this thing anymore and i apologize for this admins/sysops. Thank you. 2011Windows7SP1 (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the stated reason for the block, block evasion. 331dot (talk) 07:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2011Windows7SP1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand this block and will clearly never do the creation of the blacklisted title i made on the my userpage ever again. I really apologize for this kind of mistake i've done. I supposed to delete the user article but i was offline before got blocked a few hours. I didnt know that the page i made was a blacklisted and banned title from a banned user, and clearly i wasnt the sock of that account since my contribs are different. I am really sorry for this. The block was wrong since it was by accident and i forgot to delete it immediately.

Decline reason:

This is incoherent. Yamla (talk) 11:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Admins

I need the page [[User:2011Windows7SP1/Ali Mansur]] deleted as a request because to resolve the block. I apologize for my mistake on this creation that resulted to indef block. Thank you.

2011Windows7SP1 (talk) 00:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting that page won't "resolve" the block. You're going to need a better explanation for why you recreated the exact page a habitual block evader originally created. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will look around that. Thnks for knowing the reason. For now the real reason for this recreation was my error, I didnt know userfiying this page that the block evader did caused the block. Is there anyway to negotiate this? 2011Windows7SP1 (talk) 00:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a compelling explanation. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My explanation to this issue is technically that page that the block evader made was just a test page, i forgot to put {{db-author}} on the template because i was offline a minutes ago. As i said yet again its is clearly an test page like what ive done on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:2011Windows7SP1/List_of_cartoon_police_groups&action=history edit summary on the portion related to "Neptunia Girls On Wheels" since the functions of moveonly blacklist didnt work for me with that title. 2011Windows7SP1 (talk) 12:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't explain how you found a deleted page or what exactly you were trying to "test" by creating it. This is going nowhere; further wasting of our time will result in the loss of your talk page access. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #58914

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]