User talk:2005biggar
Duplicate images uploaded
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:CD-from-carlingwark-loch.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:CD-from-carlingwark-loch.jpg. The copy called Image:CD-from-carlingwark-loch.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Rhinns-of-kells-from-craignaw.JPG, by Andersmusician (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Rhinns-of-kells-from-craignaw.JPG fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Rhinns-of-kells-from-craignaw.JPG, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Image:Rhinns-of-kells-from-craignaw.JPG itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:07, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Heads up
[edit]Just a heads up, there's a problem with the copyrighting of some of the images you've uploaded. I appreciate you've been inactive, but if you're around and would be able to head over to Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2007_September_19/Images to comment on the situation, that would be excellent. Thank you. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 04:32, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Heel-lift-on-diamir.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Heel-lift-on-diamir.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Heel-lift-on-diamir.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Heel-lift-on-diamir.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Baboso.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Baboso.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Domuyo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Domuyo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:Bonete.jpg
[edit]File:Bonete.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Cerro Bonete.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Cerro Bonete.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- File:Sierra-nevada-6127.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Sierra-Nevada-de-Lagunas-Bravas.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of Seven Geographic Summits for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seven Geographic Summits is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Geographic Summits until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —hike395 (talk) 14:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Andean peaks with known pre-Columbian ascents, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Puma and Galan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, 2005biggar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Pucajirca form Alpamayo.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pucajirca form Alpamayo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:19, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Question about your photos
[edit]Greetings,
can you tell me where the photos such as File:Sierra-Nevada-de-Lagunas-Bravas.jpg come from? If you made the photos yourself that's fine, but if you received them from someone else you need their permission before you can upload them. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:38, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, All the photos I have recently been uploading to Wikipedia are my own work, or very occasionally taken by someone else on my camera. There are lots of people questioning these photos, I hope you can pass the message on. I haven't been active on Wikipedia for a while, but lockdown got really boring and it started raining here! I have used three digital cameras over the years. A big heavy Canon EOS from 2008 to about 2014 (on and off) a lighter (Canon I think) from about 2012 or so through to 2016 when it broke down, currently I have a Panasonic TZ-210. The photos lacking Exif tags will be older than 2008 when I still used a film camera. Slides all scanned into my computer by me. The particular photo you asked about, File:Sierra-Nevada-de-Lagunas-Bravas.jpg is one of these. I've been running expeditions to the Andes since 1989, and have climbed more (different) peaks out there than anyone else in the world. So I have a huge number of photos, about 10,000. All those published on my www.andes.org.uk website are my own copyright unless explicitly stated. I have written several guidebooks to the Andes, the latest edition is ISBN 978-09536087-6-8, just as proof of my authenticity. I hope that is enough for you not to doubt my genuine contributions. As an aside is there some way of tagging me as an expert on the Andes mountians (mainly from the mountaineering point of view)? Because every time I start editing on Wikipedia I get this same issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2005biggar (talk • contribs)
- I see. I'll inform the Commons discussion. If someone else took a photo, then you probably should ask for the deletion of these photos ... copyright gets really complicated then. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
OK. Thats great. I'll review the photos I've uploaded in the last few days just in case they were taken by someone else (usually my wife) on my camera, but there are not likely to be any.