User talk:200.78.138.53

December 2012

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from User:103.9.151.142 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 05:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that! Too much hurry with this IP editting and I must have been confused.

iPads can be confusing. 200.78.138.53 (talk) 22:51, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

200.78.138.53 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No diffs were indicated and no edits were made by me. Two editors began to immediately harrass me after my first original edits. I know hese editors hate IP editors due to fear of the unknown or for whatever reason and I warned them to stop harrassing me on my talk page. Now for some reason I keep getting notices with links to an incorrect IP address and I believe I responded on the wrong IP talk page, also. I don't believe I have changed IP addresses. This page of sockpuppets that BullRangifer is running is just harrassment against all the listed editors and is not based on any factual information. He has been asked to take it to CU but appears to be "above the law" and out of control discouraging and harrassing so many editors. Do what you must. It will prove the system is real or just a bunch of lynch mob people where AGF doesn't apply. 200.79.224.71 (talk) 06:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Looking at the history of editing from this IP address I see persistent disruptive editing of various kinds, including repeated removal of content in an apparent attempt to hide information relating to disruptive editing from other IP addresses, attacks on other users, blatantly false claims about the editing history, etc. Looking at the unblock request I see no attempt whatever to address the reasons for the block, but only further attacks on other editors. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

While I am declining your unblock request, I may as well also help you to avoid wasting more of your time, by telling you that there is no principle that suspicion of sockpuppetry must not be recorded unless a checkuser has confirmed the suspicion. Also, checkusers never connect together different IP addresses. Continuing to flog that dead horse would therefore be pointless, and now that you have had the situation explained, you can avoid wasting your time on it. Don't bother to thank me for helping you in this matter, as it took me very little trouble. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. The main issue has still been avoided, repeatedly. Why am I accused of harrassment and blocked? No reasons or examples were ever given and withthe number of responders it would appear to be just gaming of the Wikipedia system due to hatred of IPs by a certain few. 200.78.138.53 (talk) 14:39, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing history (under your various IP guises) tells the story. Your block evasion (using other IPs to edit or comment) is also enough to get you blocked yet again. Because of your history here and your numerous blocks, you are simply not supposed to do anything but read Wikipedia. Until you grow up and drop your obsession with seeking to edit, disrupt and attack, you aren't welcome here. You can save yourself lots of grief by getting an account, which will give you more privacy, and many more rights, and you'll be taken more seriously. BUT you must not let anyone know that your new account has any connection with the issues or IPs which got you in trouble or this will all start over again. You need to start with a clean slate and not revisit previous stomping grounds and previous behaviors. Stay away from those subjects and editors with whom you've been in contact. That way you can start to learn how to edit in a collaborative manner. -- Brangifer (talk) 06:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.