User talk:2%peach

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cntras (talk) 02:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by removing content without explanation and edit warring, as you did at List of cities in China, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 12:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of cities in China, you may be blocked from editing. The Interior (Talk) 07:59, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of cities in China. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

And just to make this clear: you cannot rely on the 24-hour-rule; people can get blocked for slow edit-warring as well :) Cheers! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 08:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]