User talk:1subwoofer

Welcome!

Hello, 1subwoofer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Victuallers (talk) 07:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Thanks for experimenting with the page Dingley Village, Victoria on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. SEO⁷⁵ ^[talk] 09:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carrum Carrum Swamp

Parkdale Secondary College

Please do not cut and paste content from coprighted web pages - refer WP:COPYVIO for further details. Melburnian (talk) 06:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patterson Lakes, Victoria

Hi 1subwoofer! :) I am just letting you know that all of your edits made to Patterson Lakes, do not have references or summaries. I am asking you to please, reference each section you have made/edited on the article, because all unreferenced data, may be challenged and or removed. Thank You -- MelbourneStar☆ (talk) 08:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MelbourneStar. I basically added almost all of the information on the Patterson Lakes page. I will add references where I can, however not all of the page can be referenced, because what I have added in some cases is in a sense 'local knowledge.'

Hi 1Subwoofer.

I have kept the 'Citations Needed' signs on the article, as they are required. Please add as many reliable references ASAP, and there may be a problem because unfortunately, Wikipedia does not accept Original Research that cant be back up by sources. Its a pain, yes, but I dont make the rules here. Thank You -- MelbourneStar☆ ^{(talk to me)} 02:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History of MRI

Hello 1subwoofer. Thanks for your recent addition to the History section of the MRI page (I guess you were the anon who previously added Bottomley also?). It's a bit biased/incomplete though, don't you think? Where is Peter Mansfield and the rest of the Nottingham people? Rex Richards team in Oxford? Richard Ernst in Zurich? Paul Bottomley in New York? Even Raymond Damadian surely deserves a mention here? John Mallard's group in Aberdeen? And that's just the old imaging history - there are a bunch of more recent inventions that are part of a standard clinical scanner. How about Dan Sodickson and Klaas Pruessmans for SMASH and SENSE? I'm not saying PB didn't play a significant part - he did - but there were many others too. Your addition makes it sound rather like PB was a one-man show. GyroMagician (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

Hello, not my maps, they are quite good. I'm working my way through Melb subs but a bit of help would be welcome- just add | alternative_location_map = Australia Victoria metropolitan Melbourne |longd=144.xxx|latd=37.xxx to the Infobox at top of page and map appears. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 03:38, 22 May 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

June 2012

Your recent editing history at Paul Bottomley (scientist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. 69.155.128.40 (talk) 04:46, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 1subwoofer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 1subwoofer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]