User talk:1fluidphysics

Welcome!

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

[[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

Hello, 1fluidphysics, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

1fluidphysics, good luck, and have fun. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 14:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Royalist Party, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Scuoise (talk) 15:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Royalist Party. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:17, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Alessia Cara, you may be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Royalist Party

Please stop trying to insert this everywhere. My instinct is that this does not meet our inclusion policy. If you disagree, you can try to write a draft article at Draft:Royalist Party (California), establish it's notability with what we consider reliable sources, and see if others agree. But it looks fairly promotional to me, particularly when you're trying to insert it everywhere.

It is very difficult to start out on Wikipedia by creating a new article. I'll leave a welcome template with suggestions for starting out in a minute. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must meet inclusion requirements such as WP:CORP. "All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, 1fluidphysics, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Floquenbeam (talk) 16:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for ignoring warnings from other people; it's apparent you are not going to stop unless you are blocked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good grief, I should have looked closer at that draft article. You're just fucking around. See WP:MADEUP. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1fluidphysics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Account blocked based on 1 warning and 3hrs; First.... I am the owner the Royalist-Party.org and director Of Security of the Political Party; Received One Warning & it was to not put “ Royalist Party “ everywhere; I have a list of Public figures as members of the Royalist Party to update on Wikipedia and Need to create a California royalist page and Sean Patrick Patterson Pubic figure account;

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you are even aware of WP:COI, let alone that you'll abide by it and will pay attention to the warnings you get from other people. Yamla (talk) 14:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1fluidphysics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

{{connected contributor}}

Decline reason:

You'll need to promote your fantasies somewhere else. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:25, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS 45343

UTRS appeal #45343 is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:49, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 16:58, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]