User talk:1enchilada

Nomination of African Wild Dog Conservancy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article African Wild Dog Conservancy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African Wild Dog Conservancy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm trying to make updates to the African Wild Dog Conservancy page. I'm unaware of any copyright infringement and am perplexed why an edit reversion would have occurred. I'm making a good faith effort to improve the page to the best of my ability. Would you please clarity? Having looked at the edit reference below I'm even more perplexed given that I'm the author of the content. Thanks. 1enchilada (talk) 19:37, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 18:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]