User talk:195.224.252.228

Vandalism at Chengdu J-10

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chengdu J-10, you may be blocked from editing. Loned (talk) 21:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Chengdu J-10 edit and use of sockpuppet IP addresses.

Your reasoning for changing the heading section of the Chengdu J-10 is insufficient.

1. You claim there are plenty of sources to support the claim. Then please present the claim with a proper reference from a reliable news website or think tanks. The article fourth generation fighter does not have the reference you mentioned to support the 4.5gen designation you claimed. Wikipedia itself is not a proper and reliable source.

2. The article covers all variants of the J-10 series, meaning even if I give you the benefit of the doubt, confirming the J-10C variant is a 4.5 generation fighter, does not mean Chengdu J-10 as a whole is 4.5 gen. Case in point, F-15 is a fourth-generation fighter, while F-15EX is an upgrade (4.5 gen), and a variant of the original F-15. However, the wiki article discussing the F-15 will not claim the whole aircraft family is 4.5 gen, because some variants do not meet the 4.5 standard. Chengdu J-10 is the article title, and the first sentence of the article says: “The Chengdu J-10 Vigorous Dragon (Chinese: 歼-10 猛龙; pinyin: Jiān-10 Měnglóng; NATO reporting name: Firebird), is a medium-weight, fourth-generation, single-engine, multirole combat aircraft using a delta wing and canard design”. Nowhere in this sentence mentions J-10C, why are you insisting on changing the overview of the whole aircraft family with the classification of a single variant?

3. if you want to add 4.5 gen designation. I suggest you add it in the Variants section, and with proper, reliable sources. Arguing with me that there are “plenty of sources on the internet” in edit summary does not make your edit reliable.

4. Do not spam unsourced edits and constantly change IPs. Sockpuppetry is against Wikipedia policy.

5. In no edit have you attempted to add an actual reference to the article itself, but you are arguing with me in summary. Your other edits to articles such as Chengdu J-7 was reverted by other Wikipedia editors due to the same reason. I will try to find relevant references for the article and add them to appropriate sections inside the article. Do not vandalize the heading section again. Consider this as your fourth warning.-Loned (talk) 18:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Loned (talk) 10:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

---