User talk:195.195.40.250

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 195.195.40.250, is registered to Cheltenham Ladies College, Cheltenham, GB and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Your recent edit to Childrend of the damd (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 13:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Arnon Chaffin 13:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mark Lester. – Gurch 13:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Witchcraft Act, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Witchcraft Act was changed by 195.195.40.250 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2007-10-17T14:50:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 14:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Annie, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Annie was changed by 195.195.40.250 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2007-12-01T09:39:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 09:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Culture of Portugal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JoJan (talk) 10:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Spye Park. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. CounterFX (talk) 15:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Emily Strange has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO ^Hail! 14:56, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cool (group). Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cool (group) was changed by 195.195.40.250 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-02-19T14:58:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hawling, Gloucestershire, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Hawling, Gloucestershire was changed by 195.195.40.250 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-02-19T15:02:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Richard III of England. · AndonicO ^Hail! 15:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Saint Valentine's Day massacre (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 09:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 72 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf⁴² 11:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Cheltenham Ladies' College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Cheltenham Ladies' College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 12:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Fair trade has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Abrech (talk) 19:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tetrology => Quartet

Tetralogy is the correct nomenclature, useless changing to styles of English is frowned upon Q ^{T C} 10:07, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chronic fatigue syndrome, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chronic fatigue syndrome was changed by 195.195.40.250 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-06-27T11:42:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:43, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Jake constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Gail (talk) 11:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sept 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Voting age. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MarnetteD | Talk 18:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Désirée Clary. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MarnetteD | Talk 18:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Christopher Evans (businessman). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. MarnetteD | Talk 18:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Lady Windermere's Fan, you will be blocked from editing. MarnetteD | Talk 18:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Fertilisation. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Hardyplants (talk) 17:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Warwickshire has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DavidWS (talk) 19:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Packwood Haugh School constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Soliloquial^talk 19:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Flood, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 14:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Printer (computing), you will be blocked from editing. See WP:ENGVAR. Dicklyon (talk) 06:38, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Richard Branson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Gail (talk) 14:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Phil Spencer constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 17:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jack O'Connell (actor) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Geoff ^T ^C 11:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Jack O'Connell (actor) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Geoff ^T ^C 11:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Cheltenham Ladies' College. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Geoff ^T ^C 11:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cheltenham Ladies' College, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cheltenham Ladies' College was changed by 195.195.40.250 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-02-05T15:29:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dutch, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dutch was changed by 195.195.40.250 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-02-09T18:00:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Now That's What I Call Music! 71 (UK series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 16:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Floods in Bangladesh. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 15:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Floods in Bangladesh. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:20, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Floods in Bangladesh. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Kingpin13 (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Your recent edit to Rickets (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 16:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Gary Numan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Dog poster 21:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Windowing system (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 15:34, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to William I of England‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kbthompson (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to William II of England‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kbthompson (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Henry I of England has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Martin451 (talk) 20:03, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Cheltenham Ladies' College. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ♦ Jongleur¹⁰⁰ ♦ ^talk 13:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Natural satellite has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 17:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tollund Man. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 11:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tollund Man, you will be blocked from editing. Saddhiyama (talk) 13:08, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Australian painted lady, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Australian painted lady was changed by 195.195.40.250 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-09-29T18:59:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Painted Lady. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 19:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Baptists. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Novaseminary (talk) 19:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Yann Tiersen has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 13:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Chace Crawford. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Philip Trueman (talk) 08:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Cheltenham Ladies' College has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Marcus Caelius Rufus, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 16:20, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

The recent edit you made to Clodia constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 16:21, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to 2010 eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alpha Quadrant (using semi-automated tool) ^{Report Mistake} 16:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Talk:Eyjafjallajökull constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Krashlandon ^(talk) 16:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to 90210 (season 3), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thomas888b (Say Hi) 18:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Rawdon Christie, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. » SkyyTrain (talk) 18:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hugo Swire ‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If this is a mistake, please report it in my talk page and we will go from there. Thanks! Arman Cagle^{(Contact me EMail Me Contribs)} Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 17:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Hellcats. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to SS501, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Evaders99 (talk) 06:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Carbon (fiber). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Riley Huntley (talk) 18:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, I'm GoShow. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Gossip Girl (season 6) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. GoShow (............................) 16:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Loo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Mediran ^{talk to me!} 11:21, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

Hello, I'm Ginsuloft. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jacques Charles François Sturm because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ginsuloft (talk) 08:05, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jacques Charles François Sturm. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 08:07, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jean-Daniel Colladon, you may be blocked from editing. Ginsuloft (talk) 08:11, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hollywood, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ginsuloft (talk) 08:18, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Keith Richards

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Skr15081997 (talk) 15:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Farleigh School, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Son (novel) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2015

Hello, I'm Gilliam. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Cheltenham Ladies' College seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 20:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015

Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Scopes Trial because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Gilliam (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Hypatia because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Oscar (footballer, born 1991). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017

Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shaolin Monastery have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 09:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Great Storm of 1987. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 10:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Great Storm of 1987, you may be blocked from editing. CyanoTex (talk) 10:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021

Hello, I'm Mosesheron. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Patroclus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mosesheron (talk) 13:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021

Hello, I'm RG067. An edit you recently made to Brown rat seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RG067 (talk) 09:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages

Please note that disambiguation pages like Bunda and Slay are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 22:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Book Thief—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm JCMLuis. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Gershom Bassey—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. luis. 💬 00:26, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Critical point (thermodynamics)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 07:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.