Jump to content

User talk:194.80.21.241

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism (see edit log), anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address might be disabled. You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Alternatively, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. An account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken.

September 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Montserrat, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 13:09, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Computer monitor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with your recent edit to Computer monitor, you will be blocked from editing.

Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 10:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Stop This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did with your edit to Printer (computing), you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 10:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 39 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 11:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

October 2010

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zangar (talk) 11:00, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Offset printing has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Skarebo (talk) 09:56, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Offset printing constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Skarebo (talk) 10:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Genetically modified food, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Consumer protection, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Array. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 12:54, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Array, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Array. Tomayres (talk) 13:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru (talk) 13:06, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


December 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stock market, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GraemeL (talk) 13:13, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Ian Cairns (talk) 17:45, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Michigan, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alabama with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SellymeTalk 14:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Georgia (U.S. state) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 14:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Michigan. DVdm (talk) 14:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Interstella 5555: The 5tory of the 5ecret 5tar 5ystem, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daft Punk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Daniel Howard with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Epbr123 (talk) 11:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Calabe1992 15:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Saunders, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: David Saunders was changed by 194.80.21.241 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885899 on 2011-11-07T15:19:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Thomas Bangalter, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boris Johnson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 13:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Wayne, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: John Wayne was changed by 194.80.21.241 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96207 on 2011-11-11T13:21:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:21, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Summer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! A412 (Talk * C) 15:18, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KSIOlajidebt

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KSIOlajidebt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. A412 (Talk * C) 15:18, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Musical theatre, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Musical theatre. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.Flami72 (talk) 11:51, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Development geography. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barry Hill, you may be blocked from editing. SD5 17:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Horrible Geography, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

April 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Drums in communication, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

April 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Atomic number, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

September 2013

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Arthur Conan Doyle, you may be blocked from editing. SchroCat (talk) 09:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Christian75. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Data Protection Act 1998, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Christian75 (talk) 14:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Data Protection Act 1998 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. NGPriest was here (talk | contribs) 14:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jianhui67. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Marlowe Academy because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:58, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jewellery. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.  Tentinator  14:51, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pig War (1859)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 12:00, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pig War (1859). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 12:12, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Towneley family has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hamsa (bird) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hamsa (bird). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:06, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Woman in Black has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:17, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Proactivity, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:37, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:194.80.21.241&oldid=1142809426"