User talk:194.33.196.6

February 2019

Hello, I'm Neils51. An edit that you recently made to Basil Wigoder seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Neils51 (talk) 09:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2022

Hello, I'm Oopsemoops. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Limmy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 14:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Redlinks in 'Notable' sections and disambiguation pages

You'll see that some of your recent edits have been reverted. This is because they contain "red links", Wikilinks with no article to link to. Redlink items in disambiguation pages are never useful; the purpose of those pages is to help the reader find the article for the topic they are interested in, where the title or search title could refer to multiple articles. If there is no page for the reader to be directed to, there is no reason for the item to be there. In the case of "Notable" sections in articles, the convention is that an item should have a Wikipedia article of its own, to establish that the item is indeed notable. _signed, Willondon (talk) 15:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

---