User talk:192.76.8.72

New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 192.76.8.72, is registered to University of Oxford and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

December 2017

Hello, I'm Alpha3031. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Combined oral contraceptive pill, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Alpha3031 (talk | contribs) 10:51, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dan Escott. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Count Count (talk) 13:14, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Dan Escott. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Count Count (talk) 13:16, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Collin O'Mara has been accepted

Collin O'Mara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:50, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to İmralı, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 17:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm Megaman en m. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Stereotype threat seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Megaman en m (talk) 11:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2022

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Heather Wheeler—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The King's School, Grantham, you may be blocked from editing. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:47, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Heather Wheeler. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 19:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Your deletions to Wells Fargo were unwarranted and reversed, and amount to vandalism. I added a media source (currently #138) to one item you had noted, which you could have done, instead of blanking. Please note the example of editing an article. Also note that Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia is not allowed. Lindenfall (talk) 18:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lindenfall, the deletion was backed up by policy. Please strike your accusation of vandalism. Not every edit you disagree with is vandalism. In case you disagree, you can test your accusation of vandalism at either WP:AIV or WP:ANI.

It is not my responsibility to add sources (see WP:ONUS for a related concept). Not every deletion of negative material from the article of a company by an IP constitutes a "PR clean-up" and does not warrant a COI warning. At least run a WHOIS before dishing out the link, which is not very useful either: Conflict of interest editing on Wikipedia is a mainspace article on COI editing wikipedia, WP:COI is the more helpful actual policy (and also shorter). Cheers, 129.67.116.120 (talk) 19:47, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN JTK. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Justin Clarke, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — CAPTAIN JTK (talk) 12:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.