User talk:192.203.137.196

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (192.203.137.196) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 19:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 192.203.137.196, is registered to College of DuPage and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Montgomery, Illinois

Currently, that text is sourced. You want it removed because you don't agree with the source. Therefore, either find a source that backs up your claims or take it to the talk page to discuss its removal. I don't care one way or the other, but if you keep removing it, you're going to find yourself blocked from editing because you're being disruptive. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:57, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning. Discuss it first and stop removing. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How is this information from a town perspective relative. Police departments receive complaints, all the time, so do we need to publish every single one on the towns history now. This is the village history not the history of the police department. One man claiming a racist remark was made to him, and uses a video from the officers dash-cam that does NOT contain a racist remark. Is not relative to the history of the village. The reason it should be removed because it is not relevant, the complainant only added it because they had a personal grudge. Are we going to post every complaint, that gets published to the newspaper. its unnecessary, and bias.

Wow, you actually made an argument (and a decent one at that). Amazing... except, you did it on the wrong talk page. Try here: Talk:Montgomery, Illinois. Like I said already, I really don't care. Your argument is strong, but up until now, you have been going about making changes the entirely wrong way. You can't keep removing sections (especially sourced) of an article simply because you don't like them with edit summaries of "is not truthful information, is not based on facts". If your first edit had your last edit summary of "information is not relevant to history of the village", then it may very well have not been reverted and we wouldn't be here. So, try going to the talk page, start a new section (with a header) and put your argument there. Also, don't forget to sign your posts with a (~~~~). Thanks! Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 18:58, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Guessitsavis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Christopher Vaughn have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 22:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.