User talk:190.21.177.84

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 190.21.177.84, is part of a pool of dynamically allocated addresses and is registered to Movistar Fibra. It may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register).

Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected.

In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports can be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Edit warring on Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Manti core 01:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, i don't know what is your problem nor what is the problem of the others users, i only wrote something that it is true, a fact, i even put the sources, but you are the ones who write the things you think that are right. I collaborate, but the problem is that everything for you and the other users is "vandalism" or "disruptive editing". 190.21.177.84 (talk) 01:18, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a problem. Collaboration does not mean continuing to add something to an article over the objections of editors. You should use the article talk page to discuss the issue. — Manti core 01:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summaries are deceptive. Despite many warnings to your Chile-based dynamic IPs over many months, and blocks, you keep sneaking in major changes to the film's billing block credits, and removing the HTML note that warns against making changes. So quit doing this now, and pleading innocence, please. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 08:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As for your claim that "It is completely official that the series is cancelled", the Pink News citation draws on Variety which was actually headlined "Is J.K. Rowling’s ‘Fantastic Beasts’ Franchise Dead at Warner Bros?" (a question, not proof of cancellation, as yet). It reads in part: "Given the lackluster reception to the three movies in existence, it may not be surprising that Warner Bros. has yet to definitively say whether the fourth and fifth “Fantastic Beasts” films will be completed as intended." Other editors have repeatedly reverted your changes because we are still awaiting confirmation. Thanks. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 09:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore. Deceptive edit summary while again changing billing block credits, again changing reference titles/headlines. This has been going on for months, using many Chile-based dynamic IPs, despite many warnings and some blocks. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 20:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The page is now protected. Please use the talk page to make edit requests, argue your case, and listen to feedback from other editors. I suggest you do this on all the Fantastic Beasts film pages. By the way, if you are on the spectrum – and I'm not saying you are – or if you have other difficulties, then allowances can be made to assist you. Thanks. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 08:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 190.21.177.84. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by 💜 melecie talk - 06:09, 1 May 2023 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

May 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, the sources say clearly that Willem Dafoe nor Ben Affleck are not in the movie. Those are reports from the CinemaCon 2023 190.21.177.84 (talk) 19:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be so easily duped into believing what you read online, as there are several websites (such as Murphy's Multiverse which you are citing) that are determined to not be WP:Reliable sources by the Wikipedia community, as they lack either editorial oversight or credibility, often both. Dafoe was confirmed to be in the film by Wan and rampant rumors of his removal are unconfirmed. Affleck was confirmed to have shot scenes for the film, and is remains to be seen if that gets cut, per the sources present in the article. The CinemaCon trailer did not show everything, so we can't judge off of that, especially as it has not been released publicly. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Gal Gadot, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. —Wasell^(T) 🌻🇺🇦 05:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

AfC notification: Draft:Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore (soundtrack) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore (soundtrack). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore (soundtrack) (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TechnoSquirrel69 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for your submission! This draft is in good shape, and will likely be accepted once it is made explicit which of the criteria at WP:NALBUM the topic meets. Please remember that the notability of the soundtrack needs to be established independently from the film.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore (soundtrack) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:58, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 190.21.177.84! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:58, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.