User talk:185.65.135.171

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crisis in Venezuela. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Jamez42 (talk) 23:49, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Crisis in Venezuela. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to losing your editing privileges. Thank you. --Jamez42 (talk) 23:49, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi! I've been in touch with the editor who made the changes to unvalidated sources. Is it some specific editor on the talk page I should talk with? Thanks.

185.65.135.171 (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

User ZiaLater pointed out that the information was sourced. As such, in an ideal scenario, you should provide evidence on how these sources aren't reliable or how the content is not verifiable. The best option is to make a proposal and to look for an agreement with this user. --Jamez42 (talk) 10:29, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

---