Jump to content

User talk:184.44.129.49

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

184.44.129.49 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No reason for a block.--184.44.129.49 (talk) 9:45 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

It is very likely you have not been personally blocked. Unfortunately, we are unable to unblock you because you have been caught in a rangeblock. These are applied to stop persistent vandals from using multiple IP addresses to evade their block. For our security, we cannot release this block early unless there is clear evidence of severe collateral damage. You can, however, log in to edit. If you don't have an account, you can request an account at tools:~acc, making sure to add a link to this page for our reference in the comments section. Sorry for the inconvenience, but please let us know if you have any questions.

A minority of rangeblocks are "hard blocked" and prohibit editing even if logged in, due to exceptional vandalism or other similar issues. If despite creating an account, you still find that you cannot edit even when logged in, then please contact us again with the relevant error message. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tailsman67

[edit]

See guys I kept my promises. ~Tailsman67~ 184.44.129.49 (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm leaving bye for a year.184.44.129.49 (talk) 19:57, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Salvidrim

[edit]

Oh yeah Salv 98.71.47.212 was me to,so yeah,well peace

or just ub

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

184.44.129.49 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

There puting words in my mouth like "user vows to continue with abuse",I would never say that,Is there anyway I can prove to you guys I have changed?I understand now!184.44.129.49 (talk) 15:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted above, this IP is part of a blocked range. As noted by me just now, the only edits by that IP are to this page. If you have a registered account, please request unblock there. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

184.44.129.49 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

MeZemike I want you too shorten the time of my rangeblock,insted of September,remember Wikipedia:IPs are human too and you might even stay admin longer.184.44.129.49 (talk) 15:17, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provided. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:38, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tailsman67!

[edit]

See I kept my promise.:)