User talk:184.177.118.115

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

April 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Savant syndrome—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 17:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:56, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source for the damage total on 2021 Western Kentucky tornado

Hello! I wanted to let you know that I have reverted your addition of a damage total to the 2021 Western Kentucky tornado as it did not have a source cited. Feel free to re-add the information with a source! Have a good day and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Elijahandskip (talk) 19:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source for $2.9bn appears to indicate all of Kentucky, not just this tornado.--47.16.96.33 (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Life of Pi (film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Life of Pi (film). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 1960 Atlantic hurricane season, you may be blocked from editing. --47.16.96.33 (talk) 20:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you ~~vandalize~~ make test edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1999 East India cyclone. --47.16.96.33 (talk) 21:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for the overly harsh language; I think you're trying to be helpful, but you seem to lack competence in doing so. Please double think your edits through, and any changes should be accompanied by reliable sources, also you should make sure files exist before adding them to articles. --47.16.96.33 (talk) 21:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to 1960 Atlantic hurricane season does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! --98.116.128.15 (talk) 16:08, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 16:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 1999 Bridge Creek–Moore tornado, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The windspeed is never stated as being exactly 323 mph as the highest as the DOW windspeed measurements were not precise enough. Please stop changing the windspeed information to say 323 mph is the highest as that is inaccurate information.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1999 Bridge Creek–Moore tornado, you may be blocked from editing. Elijahandskip (talk) 20:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source that directly states 323 mph is the highest windspeed of the 1999 Bridge Creek–Moore tornado. If not, please do not change the windspeed range and if you do, please cite that source directly when you change the windspeed. Elijahandskip (talk) 20:36, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1999 Bridge Creek–Moore tornado. United States Man (talk) 00:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Administrator Noticeboard/Incidents Discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Elijahandskip (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.