User talk:184.175.12.75

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:4D94:1769:7F0B:FB12 (talk) 16:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

184.175.12.75 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked on the request of an anon, without even being given the chance to reply to the discussion about me. Anon's reasoning in the thread is, once more, passive-aggressive (implying that someone is incompetent, without having the courage to say it, and without proof, is the DICTIONARY DEFINITION of passive aggression). I treated such actions with the seriousness they deserved, no more, no less. Christine McGlade IS in fact well-known as "Moose" McGlade (IMDB lists it as her nickname - https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0569427/, if you type Moose McGlade into Google you'll get all the references you want). Stewart Francis' humour DOES centre almost solely on what might be called "dad jokes", i.e. one-liner puns (once more, watch a Stewart Francis act on YouTube). Each edit I made is supported by facts, as did the main body of the comment I placed on Anon's talk page. Yes, I called him an arrogant shit in the edit note, I'm sorry for that, but that was the ONE thing I did wrong and if anything it is THAT ONE THING, and nothing else, I should have been warned (not blocked) for. 184.175.12.75 (talk) 16:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block was completely appropriate and if you continue editing like you have been once the block expires, expect a considerably longer block next time. Yamla (talk) 16:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2022--continued vandalism, at Riot Act

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:CC3A (talk) 22:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.