Jump to content

User talk:183.89.250.246

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Do you want to help build a consensus?

[edit]

Thank you for re-adding some of the changes I had made; it would have felt like a colossal waste of my time for my good-faith edits to be reverted like that, especially as I had started re-reading the book to verify the information. I would however still like to come to a consensus with MichaelMaggs; if you want, you can come to my talk page for the three of us to discuss. Maybe I'll move the discussion to the article talk page later so I don't get bombed with notifications, but maybe not until the RfC is finished. Unnamed anon (talk) 02:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Irrational have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Irrational was changed by 183.89.250.246 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95721 on 2024-08-09T06:18:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:18, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which cover for And_Then_There_Were_None ?

[edit]

I've started a discussion at Talk:And_Then_There_Were_None#Deciding_which_cover_should_be_displayed_in_the_infobox. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:22, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Novels, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not make significant edits to the Manuals of Style without first getting consensus for your desired changes. DonIago (talk) 05:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Pieces of Me (film): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thanks for your work on the Novel MOS!

[edit]

I’ve expressed this before but as I see you continuing to work I want to express it again— thanks for tackling the novels MOS so thoroughly and thoughtfully! It’s been a pleasure to see someone putting in the time to make sensible improvements there, and I know it will have a huge benefit for future editors seeking guidance. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 03:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing. I'm not sure what to think about this reasoning. I'm not inclined to ping all the editors from the previous discussion, but I don't think we should have to, considering that this point was not the focus of that discussion. 183.89.250.246 (talk) 11:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]