User talk:181.167.96.151

October 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 01:14, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Chyler Leigh. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:16, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at David Ramsey, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. You are continuing to ignore the proper use of 'rowspan' as per WP:ACCESSIBILITY. If you continue disruptively editing this way, it will likely lead to a block from editing. Please stop. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Chris Savino. You've already been warned about inappropriate use of 'rowspan' in tables. By this point, your editing on this is nothing more than disruptive. Consider this your final warning. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 03:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia can't be used as a source. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 03:21, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Thegooduser. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 03:21, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 02:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

181.167.96.151 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was removing the timeline for Banjo-Kazooie because, according to some idiots, if a game has less than 6 games it shouldn’t have a timeline, how do I know this? Because they removed the timeline for Bubsy for the exact reasons I just mentioned.

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please consider joining the talk page discussion when your block expires. And try not to call anyone who disagrees with you an idiot. Or assume that every video game article is written with exact 1:1 consistency with one another. Sergecross73 msg me 14:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Your recent editing history at List of Scooby-Doo media shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:12, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sorry... I’m very angry when this stuff happens for no reason. Though be aware that I might do this again despite me apologizing because we are all human beings with flaws.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. I almost blocked you myself for edit warring and personal attacks, for example [1][2]. I decided to give you one more chance based on your apology here. From now on, if you disagree with someone, discuss it calmly at the talk page. "Be aware" that if you "do this again" you may be blocked immediately; you have had enough warnings and notices. MelanieN (talk) 22:04, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

So...

...My account name changed for some reason, and the weirdest part is: this has already happened to me before. I was previously 186.137.87.137 but then it changed for no reason. Now it’s happened and my new account name is 181.167.147.99 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.167.147.99 (talk) 01:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.