User talk:178.223.95.72

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

178.223.95.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

No proof ever given about alleged sockpupettry. I did not violate a single Wikipedia rule ever. --178.223.95.72 (talk) 05:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The sockpuppet investigation is at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vujkovica brdo/Archive. If you know nothing about any sockpuppetry, you should request the creation of an account at WP:ACC to avoid this problem. 331dot (talk) 08:48, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

178.223.95.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

No proof ever given about alleged sockpupettry. I did not violate a single Wikipedia rule ever. The rejection of my first request makes no sense since there were no sockpuppet investigation at all where my IP was reported

Decline reason:

Great. So long as you are not in any way related to Vujkovica brdo, you need to follow the instructions above to have an account created for you. There's nothing more we can do for you if you are unwilling to do that. Yamla (talk) 11:43, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

178.223.95.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'll repeat: No proof ever given about alleged sockpupettry. I did not violate a single Wikipedia rule ever. If someone like Eppstein is free to block my IP for no reason, then what use to request the creation of an account at WP:ACC? He can do the same against my created account. Before creating an account I'd like not to be someone with the account already marked as a puppet for no reason.

Decline reason:

Your account is not "already marked as a puppet" as you don't have one. Also, you will not get this IP unblocked by casting aspersions on what an admin might do next. Do you want to be able to edit? Do what you have been advised then, and request an account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

178.223.95.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'll repeat: No proof ever given about alleged sockpupettry. I did not violate a single Wikipedia rule ever. @Boing! said Zebedee Your account is not "already marked as a puppet" as you don't have one. You distorted intentionally what I said. I was talking about a newly created account that will bear a clear connection to the blocked and marked as a puppet IP address for no reason. Also, I am not casting aspersions rather pointing at the arbitrary block of my IP.

Decline reason:

The block is not "arbitrary"; it has been placed because this IP has been used by a serial sockpuppeteer. That may or may not be you; we have no way of knowing who is actually sitting at the keyboard. Regardless, no reason has been given to unblock this IP, since there is no guarantee that it will not continue to be used for block evasion. Yunshui ^雲_水 15:48, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Enough time has been wasted here. Talk page access revoked. Another admin will be along shortly to review your unblock request. If they decline it, you are free to follow the instructions you've been repeatedly given. --Yamla (talk) 13:30, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

---