User talk:176.88.95.196

November 2020

Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Line Friends—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 05:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alita: Battle Angel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 23:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Liquorice (confectionery), you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 16:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Your recent editing history at 5-Minute Crafts shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:27, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Brian Locking, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Timmy (talk) 20:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Tau (disambiguation). However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
  • Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references

Thank you.  Dr Greg  talk  18:19, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Pointless bad edits

Edits like this are, under best possible circumstances, irrelevant for readers and pointless for other editors. This particular example, which I've reverted, made the formula objectively worse for readers. Many of your edits are similar to this. Please stop. --JBL (talk) 19:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

$e\pi$ and $e^{e}$ are irrational but still not yet known to be transcendental. $\zeta (3)$ is also transcendental as well. It is unknown if $e+\pi ,\pi -e,{\frac {e}{\pi }},{\frac {\pi }{e}},\ln \pi ,\pi ^{e},\pi ^{\pi },\pi ^{\sqrt {2}},\pi ^{\sqrt {3}},e^{\sqrt {\pi }},e^{\pi ^{2}},2^{e},2^{\pi },3^{e},3^{\pi },10^{e},10^{\pi }$, Euler-Mascheroni constant $\gamma$, or Euler-Gompertz constant $\delta$ are irrational or not. 176.88.95.196 (talk) 19:47, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

---